Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21338618›Full record

ArticleToxicology and applied pharmacology2011

Pretreatment by low-dose fibrates protects against acute free fatty acid-induced renal tubule toxicity by counteracting PPARα deterioration.

Kyoko Takahashi, Yuji Kamijo, Kazuhiko Hora, Koji Hashimoto, Makoto Higuchi, Takero Nakajima, Takashi Ehara, Hidekazu Shigematsu, Frank J Gonzalez, Toshifumi Aoyama

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Frontiers in nephrology · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Metabolic Reprogramming and Renal Fibrosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kyoko TakahashiDepartment of Metabolic Regulation, Institute on Aging and Adaptation, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan.
Yuji Kamijo
Kazuhiko Hora
Koji Hashimoto
Makoto Higuchi
Takero Nakajima
Takashi Ehara
Hidekazu Shigematsu
Frank J Gonzalez
Toshifumi Aoyama
Shinshu University · JPNational Cancer Institute · USŌtani University · JP

Funding

Xenobiotic ReceptorsZIABC005708 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GONZALEZ, FRANK J · 2009 to 2025
$16.4M
TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION OF GENES ENCODING XENOBIOTIC METABOLIZING ENZYMESZ01BC005561 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GONZALEZ, FRANK · 1996 to 2008
$754k
Liver-Enriched Transcription FactorsZIABC005561 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GONZALEZ, FRANK J · 2009 to 2010
$500k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC005561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of a preventive strategy against tubular damage associated with proteinuria is of great importance. Recently, free fatty acid (FFA) toxicities accompanying proteinuria were found to be a main cause of tubular damage, which was aggravated by insufficiency of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα), suggesting the benefit of PPARα activation. However, an earlier study using a murine acute tubular injury model, FFA-overload nephropathy, demonstrated that high-dose treatment of PPARα agonist (0.5% clofibrate diet) aggravated the tubular damage as a consequence of excess serum accumulation of clofibrate metabolites due to decreased kidney elimination. To induce the renoprotective effects of PPARα agonists without drug accumulation, we tried a pretreatment study using low-dose clofibrate (0.1% clofibrate diet) using the same murine model. Low-dose clofibrate pretreatment prevented acute tubular injuries without accumulation of its metabolites. The tubular protective effects appeared to be associated with the counteraction of PPARα deterioration, resulting in the decrease of FFAs influx to the kidney, maintenance of fatty acid oxidation, diminution of intracellular accumulation of undigested FFAs, and attenuation of disease developmental factors including oxidative stress, apoptosis, and NFκB activation. These effects are common to other fibrates and dependent on PPARα function. Interestingly, however, clofibrate pretreatment also exerted PPARα-independent tubular toxicities in PPARα-null mice with FFA-overload nephropathy. The favorable properties of fibrates are evident when PPARα-dependent tubular protective effects outweigh their PPARα-independent tubular toxicities. This delicate balance seems to be easily affected by the drug dose. It will be important to establish the appropriate dosage of fibrates for treatment against kidney disease and to develop a novel PPARα activator that has a steady serum concentration regardless of kidney dysfunction.

Indexed as

AnimalsClofibrateFatty Acids, NonesterifiedFemaleHistocytochemistryHypolipidemic AgentsKidney TubulesMicePPAR alphaProteinuriaReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerSpecific Pathogen-Free OrganismsClofibrateFatty Acids, NonesterifiedHypolipidemic AgentsPPAR alphaRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID21338618
PMCPMC6300991
OpenAlexW1964193113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.