Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21338175›Full record

ReviewACS nano2011

Electrons, photons, and force: quantitative single-molecule measurements from physics to biology.

Shelley A Claridge, Jeffrey J Schwartz, Paul S Weiss

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS nano, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Single-Molecule Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Single-molecule and -particle probing crystal edge/corner as highly efficient photocatalytic sites on a single TiOProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Nano-Modeling and Computation in Bio and Brain Dynamics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Development of new photon-counting detectors for single-molecule fluorescence microscopy.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shelley A ClaridgeCalifornia NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-7227, USA.
Jeffrey J Schwartz
Paul S Weiss

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-molecule measurement techniques have illuminated unprecedented details of chemical behavior, including observations of the motion of a single molecule on a surface, and even the vibration of a single bond within a molecule. Such measurements are critical to our understanding of entities ranging from single atoms to the most complex protein assemblies. We provide an overview of the strikingly diverse classes of measurements that can be used to quantify single-molecule properties, including those of single macromolecules and single molecular assemblies, and discuss the quantitative insights they provide. Examples are drawn from across the single-molecule literature, ranging from ultrahigh vacuum scanning tunneling microscopy studies of adsorbate diffusion on surfaces to fluorescence studies of protein conformational changes in solution.

Indexed as

ElectronsMechanical PhenomenaPhotonsBiologyHumansPhysics

Identifiers

PMID21338175
PMCPMC3043607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.