Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21337026›Full record

ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2011

Novel QCA methodologies and angiographic scores.

Vivian G Ng, Alexandra J Lansky

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Deep learning prediction of quantitative coronary angiography values using myocardial perfusion images with a CZT camera.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Applying Deep Neural Networks over Homomorphic Encrypted Medical Data.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cardiovascular imaging 2011 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2012
    Review
  10. QCA, IVUS and OCT in interventional cardiology in 2011.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2011
    Review
  11. QCA editorial.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vivian G NgColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Alexandra J Lansky

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary angiography remains the gold-standard method for evaluating coronary artery disease and interventional treatments. As percutaneous coronary interventions have advanced, quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) techniques have also evolved in order to provide more accurate assessments of these therapies. Improvements have been made at each step of the QCA process from image acquisition to vessel analysis. In addition, multiple scoring systems have been developed in order to utilize QCA data, both alone and in conjunction with clinical factors, to better stratify patient risk. This article will review the recent advancements in QCA techniques and outcome prediction models.

Indexed as

Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexStents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.