Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21336847›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2011

Principal curves as skeletons of tubular objects: locally characterizing the structures of axons.

Erhan Bas, Deniz Erdogmus

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erhan BasCognitive Systems Laboratory, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA, USA. bas@ece.neu.edu
Deniz Erdogmus

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developments in image acquisition technology make high volumes of neuron images available to neuroscientists for analysis. However, manual processing of these images is not practical and is infeasible for larger and larger scale studies. Reliable interpretation and analysis of high volume data requires accurate quantitative measures. This requires analysis algorithms to use mathematical models that inherit the underlying geometry of biological structures in order to extract topological information. In this paper, we first introduce principal curves as a model for the underlying skeleton of axons and branches, then describe a recursive principal curve tracing (RPCT) method to extract this topology information from 3D microscopy imagery. RPCT first finds samples on the one dimensional principal set of the intensity function in space. Then, given an initial direction and location, the algorithm iteratively traces the principal curve in space using our principal curve tracing (PCT) method. Recursive implementation of PCT provides a compact solution for extracting complex tubular structures that exhibit bifurcations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsAxonsComputer SimulationHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMicroscopy, ConfocalModels, NeurologicalNeuroanatomical Tract-Tracing TechniquesSoftware DesignSoftware Validation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.