ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2011
Assessment of coronary stent by optical coherence tomography, methodology and definitions.
Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Algorithm for Stent Coverage Assessments.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Expert consensus statement for quantitative measurement and morphologic assessment of optical coherence tomography: update 2025.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2025Review
- NIR-II scattering gold superclusters for intravascular optical coherence tomography molecular imaging.Nature nanotechnology · 2025Article
- Article
- Clinical Importance of the LDL-C/Apolipoprotein B Ratio for Neointimal Formation after Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantations.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2022Article
- Effect of drug-coated balloon angioplasty on in-stent restenotic coronary lesions analyzed with optical coherence tomography and serial coronary artery angioscopy.Heart and vessels · 2019Observational
- Neointimal tissue characterization after implantation of drug-eluting stents by optical coherence tomography: quantitative analysis of optical density.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2019Article
- Optical coherence tomography evaluation of the absorb bioresorbable scaffold performance for overlap versus non-overlap segments in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion: insight from the GHOST-CTO registry.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2019Article
- Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2018Article
- Endoscopic optical coherence tomography: technologies and clinical applications [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2017Article
- Impact of Age on Stent Strut Coverage and Neointimal Remodeling as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography.Medicine · 2015Observational
- Intravascular optical coherence tomography light scattering artifacts: merry-go-rounding, blooming, and ghost struts.Journal of biomedical optics · 2014Article
- The impact of Fourier-Domain optical coherence tomography catheter induced motion artefacts on quantitative measurements of a PLLA-based bioresorbable scaffold.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2014Article
- Contemporary assessment of stent strut coverage by OCT.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2013Article
- Optical coherence tomography-based evaluation of malapposed strut coverage after drug-eluting stent implantation.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2012Article
- Cardiovascular imaging 2011 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2012Review
- QCA, IVUS and OCT in interventional cardiology in 2011.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optical coherence tomography has emerged as a powerful tool for stent assessment, and in a short time, has become the modality of choice for studying stent and vascular interactions in vivo. In this review, we discuss qualitative and quantitative parameters used for stent assessment by OCT. Various qualitative/quantitative variables of stent assessment are discussed in the perspective of the clinical and research values of each of them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.