Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2133465›Full record

ReviewThe Histochemical journal1990

Histochemical classification based upon reaction types and its application to carbohydrate histochemistry.

P E Reid, D A Owen, P A Kruk, M E Maitland

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Histochemical journal, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P E ReidDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
D A Owen
P A Kruk
M E Maitland

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A method of classification is presented, which divides histochemical visualization reactions into categories based on general reaction types. This scheme is dependent upon the reaction between two elements, the substrate and the probe. The substrate represents a tissue component(s) with one or more reactive groups that can combine directly with the probe. Alternatively, the substrate reactive groups are chemically modified (activation) with a suitable reagent before reaction with the probe. Probes are of three types: those that yield a coloured product, those that result in a colourless product, and those that produce a coloured product only after a further reaction. Methods used in carbohydrate histochemistry are divided into one, two and three probe reactions. Two probe reactions are further subdivided into sequences involving one or two coloured products (one and two dye sequences); three probe reactions into sequences involving one, two or three coloured products (one, two and three dye sequences). This classification permits the rationalization and organization of methods, and provides a framework for the examination of existing methods and the development of new ones.

Indexed as

CarbohydratesHistocytochemistryCarbohydrates

Identifiers

PMID2133465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.