Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21333716›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2011

A non-canonical start codon in the Drosophila fragile X gene yields two functional isoforms.

R W Beerman, T A Jongens

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Structural basis for non-AUG translation regulation by 5MPs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Unconventional translation initiation factor EIF2A is required for Drosophila spermatogenesis.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Novel West syndrome candidate genes in a Chinese cohort.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2018
    Article
  6. Modeling Fragile X Syndrome inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Repeat-associated non-AUG translation and its impact in neurodegenerative disease.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A proteogenomic survey of the Medicago truncatula genome.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R W BeermanDepartment of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
T A Jongens
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM008216 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI EPSTEIN, DOUGLAS J · 1987 to 2023
$8.3M
Modeling Fragile X Syndrome in DrosophiliaR01GM086902 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JONGENS, THOMAS A · 2010 to 2013
$1.4M
Regulation of the Drosophila Fragile X Protein by siRNA Pathway ComponentsR21MH086705 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JONGENS, THOMAS A · 2009 to 2010
$431k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM086902NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086902NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008216NIMH NIH HHS MH086705NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH086705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome is caused by the loss of expression of the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP). As a RNA binding protein, FMRP functions in translational regulation, localization, and stability of its neuronal target transcripts. The Drosophila homologue, dFMR1, is well conserved in sequence and function with respect to human FMRP. Although dFMR1 is known to express two main isoforms, the mechanism behind production of the second, more slowly migrating isoform has remained elusive. Furthermore, it remains unknown whether the two isoforms may also contribute differentially to dFMR1 function. We have found that this second dFMR1 isoform is generated through an alternative translational start site in the dfmr1 5'UTR. This 5'UTR coding sequence is well conserved in the melanogaster group. Translation of the predominant, smaller form of dFMR1 (dFMR1-S(N)) begins at a canonical start codon (ATG), whereas translation of the minor, larger form (dFMR1-L(N)) begins upstream at a non-canonical start codon (CTG). To assess the contribution of the N-terminal extension toward dFMR1 activity, we generated transgenic flies that exclusively express either dFMR1-S(N) or dFMR1-L(N). Expression analyses throughout development revealed that dFMR1-S(N) is required for normal dFMR1-L(N) expression levels in adult brains. In situ expression analyses showed that either dFMR1-S(N) or dFMR1-L(N) is individually sufficient for proper dFMR1 localization in the nervous system. Functional studies demonstrated that both dFMR1-S(N) and dFMR1-L(N) can function independently to rescue dfmr1 null defects in synaptogenesis and axon guidance. Thus, dfmr1 encodes two functional isoforms with respect to expression and activity throughout neuronal development.

Indexed as

AnimalsCodon, InitiatorDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Gene Expression RegulationProtein IsoformsCodon, InitiatorDrosophila ProteinsFMR1 protein, DrosophilaFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Protein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID21333716
PMCPMC3074047
OpenAlexW2139751182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.