ArticleNeuroscience2011
A non-canonical start codon in the Drosophila fragile X gene yields two functional isoforms.
Article in Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural basis for non-AUG translation regulation by 5MPs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Unconventional translation initiation factor EIF2A is required for Drosophila spermatogenesis.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2022Article
- Exploring the Diverse Functional and Regulatory Consequences of Alternative Splicing in Development and Disease.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- New pathologic mechanisms in nucleotide repeat expansion disorders.Neurobiology of disease · 2019Review
- Novel West syndrome candidate genes in a Chinese cohort.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2018Article
- Modeling Fragile X Syndrome inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018Review
- Non-AUG translation: a new start for protein synthesis in eukaryotes.Genes & development · 2017Review
- Proteomics of the Synapse--A Quantitative Approach to Neuronal Plasticity.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2016Review
- Gene Model Annotations for Drosophila melanogaster: The Rule-Benders.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
- Repeat-associated non-AUG translation and its impact in neurodegenerative disease.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2014Review
- CGG repeat-associated translation mediates neurodegeneration in fragile X tremor ataxia syndrome.Neuron · 2013Article
- The RNA-binding proteins FMR1, rasputin and caprin act together with the UBA protein lingerer to restrict tissue growth in Drosophila melanogaster.PLoS genetics · 2013Article
- A proteogenomic survey of the Medicago truncatula genome.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fragile X syndrome is caused by the loss of expression of the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP). As a RNA binding protein, FMRP functions in translational regulation, localization, and stability of its neuronal target transcripts. The Drosophila homologue, dFMR1, is well conserved in sequence and function with respect to human FMRP. Although dFMR1 is known to express two main isoforms, the mechanism behind production of the second, more slowly migrating isoform has remained elusive. Furthermore, it remains unknown whether the two isoforms may also contribute differentially to dFMR1 function. We have found that this second dFMR1 isoform is generated through an alternative translational start site in the dfmr1 5'UTR. This 5'UTR coding sequence is well conserved in the melanogaster group. Translation of the predominant, smaller form of dFMR1 (dFMR1-S(N)) begins at a canonical start codon (ATG), whereas translation of the minor, larger form (dFMR1-L(N)) begins upstream at a non-canonical start codon (CTG). To assess the contribution of the N-terminal extension toward dFMR1 activity, we generated transgenic flies that exclusively express either dFMR1-S(N) or dFMR1-L(N). Expression analyses throughout development revealed that dFMR1-S(N) is required for normal dFMR1-L(N) expression levels in adult brains. In situ expression analyses showed that either dFMR1-S(N) or dFMR1-L(N) is individually sufficient for proper dFMR1 localization in the nervous system. Functional studies demonstrated that both dFMR1-S(N) and dFMR1-L(N) can function independently to rescue dfmr1 null defects in synaptogenesis and axon guidance. Thus, dfmr1 encodes two functional isoforms with respect to expression and activity throughout neuronal development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.