ArticleBMC family practice2011
General practitioners' and district nurses' conceptions of the encounter with obese patients in primary health care.
Article in BMC family practice, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies exploring GPs' and nurses' perspectives on discussing weight with patients with overweight and obesity in primary care.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2021Pooled it
- Protocol of a cluster randomized trial to investigate the impact of a type 2 diabetes risk prediction model on change in physical activity in primary care.BMC endocrine disorders · 2018Trial
- Discussing Weight with Patients in Primary Care in Australia: A Mixed Methods Experimental Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- The Basis of Patient Resistance to Opportunistic Discussions About Weight in Primary Care.Health communication · 2024Article
- The Use of Effective Language and Communication in the Management of Obesity: the Challenge for Healthcare Professionals.Current obesity reports · 2021Review
- To initiate the conversation - Public health nurses' experiences of working with obesity in persons with mobility disability.Journal of advanced nursing · 2019Article
- A Practical Guide to Engaging Individuals with Obesity.Obesity facts · 2016Review
- Setting goal and implementation intentions in consultations between practice nurses and patients with overweight or obesity in general practice.Public health nutrition · 2015Article
- Association between perceived health care stigmatization and BMI change.Obesity facts · 2014Article
- Differences in the perceived role of the healthcare provider in delivering vascular health checks: a Q methodology study.BMC family practice · 2013Article
- Obstacles to the prevention of overweight and obesity in the context of child health care in Sweden.BMC family practice · 2013Article
- The right perspective on responsibility for ill health.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2013Article
- Clinical review: modified 5 As: minimal intervention for obesity counseling in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2013Review
- Swedish Child Health Care nurses conceptions of overweight in children: a qualitative study.BMC family practice · 2012Article
- Family physician attitudes in managing obesity: a cross-sectional survey study.BMC research notes · 2011Article
- Rural Family Medicine Clinicians' Motivations to Participate in a Pragmatic Obesity Trial.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
- Breaking the Silence on Obesity.American journal of lifestyle medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary health care specialists have a key role in the management of obesity. Through understanding how they conceive the encounter with patients with obesity, treatment may be improved. The aim of this study was thus to explore general practitioners' and district nurses' conceptions of encountering patients with obesity in primary health care.
methodData were collected through semi-structured interviews, and analysed using a phenomenographic approach. The participants were 10 general practitioners (6 women, 4 men) and 10 district nurses (7 women, 3 men) from 19 primary health care centres within a well-defined area of Sweden.
resultsFive descriptive categories were identified: Adequate primary health care, Promoting lifestyle change, Need for competency, Adherence to new habits and Understanding patient attitudes. All participants, independent of gender and profession, were represented in the descriptive categories. Some profession and gender differences were, however, found in the underlying conceptions. The general staff view was that obesity had to be prioritised. However, there was also the contradictory view that obesity is not a disease and therefore not the responsibility of primary health care. Despite this, staff conceived it as important that patients were met with respect and that individual solutions were provided which could be adhered to step-by-step by the patient. Patient attitudes, such as motivation to change, evasive behaviour, too much trust in care and lack of self-confidence, were, however, conceived as major barriers to a fruitful encounter.
conclusionsFindings from this study indicate that there is a need for development and organisation of weight management in primary health care. Raising awareness of staff's negative views of patient attitudes is important since it is likely that it affects the patient-staff relationship and staff's treatment efforts. More research is also needed on gender and profession differences in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.