Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21331531›Full record

SynthesisGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2011

Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Task Force for Research Promotion: clinical utility of ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in gastric cancer. A systematic review of the literature.

Hideaki Shimada, Shinichi Okazumi, Masamichi Koyama, Koji Murakami

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Characteristics ofCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Efficacy ofCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Impact ofJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Evaluation ofClinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The potential utility of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hideaki ShimadaDepartment of Surgery, Toho University School of Medicine, Omori Medical Center, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan. hideaki.shimada@med.toho-u.ac.jp
Shinichi Okazumi
Masamichi Koyama
Koji Murakami
Keio University · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JPToho University · JPToho University Omori Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since April 2010, the Japanese Public Health Insurance System has covered the costs incurred for performing ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging for patients with advanced gastric cancer. The aim of this review was to evaluate the clinical impact of PET for patients with gastric cancer. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE using the keywords "gastric cancer" and "PET" to search for relevant articles published from January 2000 to September 2010. The clinical impact of selected articles was assessed by the authors to evaluate the following: (a) tumor staging, (b) diagnosis for recurrent disease, (c) evaluation of treatment response, and (d) screening for gastric cancer. FDG uptake increases in papillary adenocarcinoma, tubular adenocarcinoma, and solid-type poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. This uptake is also associated with glucose transporter 1 expression. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for metastatic lymph node detection were 21-40% and 89-100%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for distant metastasis detection were 35-74% and 74-99%, respectively. Treatment response can be detectable at an earlier stage by PET than by computed tomography (CT), because FDG uptake by cancer cells decreases according to the treatment response. In summary, although PET has limitations such as frequent false-negative cases in signet-ring cell carcinoma and non-solid type poorly differentiated carcinoma, it can contribute to the selection of a more appropriate treatment modality by detecting distant metastases and treatment response.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Early Detection of CancerGastric MucosaGlucose Transporter Type 1HumansLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyStomach NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeFluorodeoxyglucose F18Glucose Transporter Type 1

Identifiers

PMID21331531
OpenAlexW2017642154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.