Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21331361›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedicine & biotechnology2011

Experimental trauma models: an update.

Michael Frink, Hagen Andruszkow, Christian Zeckey, Christian Krettek, Frank Hildebrand

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Macrophages on demand: How tissue trauma shapes their role.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Mechanical Characterization and Modeling of the Porcine Cerebral Meninges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Mouse Injury Model of Polytrauma and Shock.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018
    Review
  12. A new multiple trauma model of the mouse.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2017
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Blood-banking techniques for plateletpheresis in swine.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2014
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael FrinkTrauma Department, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. michaelfrink@web.de
Hagen Andruszkow
Christian Zeckey
Christian Krettek
Frank Hildebrand

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of polytrauma patients remains a medical as well as socioeconomic challenge. Although diagnostics and therapy improved during the last decades, multiple injuries are still the major cause of fatalities in patients below 45 years of age. Organ dysfunction and organ failure are major complications in patients with major injuries and contribute to mortality during the clinical course. Profound understanding of the systemic pathophysiological response is crucial for innovative therapeutic approaches. Therefore, experimental studies in various animal models are necessary. This review is aimed at providing detailed information of common trauma models in small as well as in large animals.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalWounds and InjuriesAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID21331361
PMCPMC3035380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.