ArticleCommunicative & integrative biology2010
Static magnetic field accelerates aging and development in nematode.
Article in Communicative & integrative biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Static Magnetic Field Inhibits the Migration and Telomerase Function of Mouse Breast Cancer Cells.BioMed research international · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electro-magnetic fields are everywhere in our life. The strength and duration of human exposure is proportional to the degree of industrialization. The possible health hazard has been investigated for decades. C. elegans (nematode) has been a sensitive tool to study aging and development. The current study investigated the possible effects of static magnetic fields (SMFs) on the developmental and aging processes of C. elegans. Nematodes were grown in the presence of SMFs of strengths varying from 0 to 200 mT. Treatment with a 200 mT SMF reduced the development times from L2 to young adult by approximately 20%. After SMF treatment, the average lifespan was reduced from 31 days to 25 days for wild-type nematodes. The upregulation of genes associated with development and aging was verified by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Nematodes carrying mutation in these genes also exhibited resistance to the SMFs treatment. Apparently, induction of gene expression is selective and dose-dependent. SMFs accelerate nematode development and shorten nematode lifespan through pathways associated with let-7, clk-1, unc-3 and age-1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.