Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21330907›Full record

Trial reportAIDS (London, England)2011

Safety and effectiveness of BufferGel and 0.5% PRO2000 gel for the prevention of HIV infection in women.

Salim S Abdool Karim, Barbra A Richardson, Gita Ramjee, Irving F Hoffman, Zvavahera M Chirenje, Taha Taha, Muzala Kapina, Lisa Maslankowski, Anne Coletti, Albert Profy and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00074425 (Phase II/IIb Safety and Effectiveness Study of the Vaginal Microbicides BufferGel and 0.5% PRO 2000/5 Gel), which is not on this map. Cited by 130 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
29.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00074425 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II/IIb Safety and Effectiveness Study of the Vaginal Microbicides BufferGel and 0.5% PRO 2000/5 Gel (P) for the Prevention of HIV Infection in Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Ran2005 to 2008Enrolled3,101ConditionsHIV InfectionsArmsBufferGel, PRO 2000/5 Gel, Placebo gel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Topical microbicides for preventing sexually transmitted infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 14 institutions in 5 countries.

Salim S Abdool KarimCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Congella, South Africa. caprisa@ukzn.ac.za
Barbra A Richardson
Gita Ramjee
Irving F Hoffman
Zvavahera M Chirenje
Taha Taha
Muzala Kapina
Lisa Maslankowski
Anne Coletti
Albert Profy
Thomas R Moench
Estelle Piwowar-Manning
Benoît Mâsse
Sharon L Hillier
Lydia Soto-Torres
HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 035 Study Team
Johns Hopkins University · USCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia · ZMCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa · ZAEndo Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USFamily Health International 360 · USNational Institutes of Health · USReProtect (United States) · USSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Zimbabwe · ZW

Funding

Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2011 to 2021
$175.0M
Microbicide Trials NetworkU01AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2006 to 2010
$77.0M
HIV PREVENTION TRIALS NETWORK LEADERSHIP GROUPU01AI046749 · NIAID · FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL · PI CATES, WILLARD · 1999 to 2005
$73.5M
Statistical and Data Management Center (SDMC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068615 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BROWN, ELIZABETH RENATA · 2011 to 2021
$66.5M
Leadership for HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials Networks; Microbicide Trials NetworkU01AI068615 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RICHARDSON, BARBRA A · 2006 to 2010
$20.4M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI046749NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068615NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068633NIAID NIH HHS U01AI068633NIAID NIH HHS U01AI46749NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068615NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068633NIAID NIH HHS UO1AI068615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the safety and effectiveness of BufferGel and 0.5% PRO2000 microbicide gels for the prevention of male-to-female HIV transmission.

designPhase II/IIb, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with three double-blinded gel arms and an open-label no gel arm.

methodsStudy participants from Malawi, South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe, and the USA were instructed to apply study gel up to 1 h before each sex act and safety, sexual behavior, pregnancy, gel adherence, acceptability, and HIV serostatus were assessed during follow-up.

resultsThe 3101 enrolled women were followed for an average of 20.4 months with 93.6% retention and 81.1% self-reported gel adherence. Adverse event rates were similar in all study arms. HIV incidence rates in the 0.5% PRO2000 gel, BufferGel, placebo gel, and no gel arms were 2.70, 4.14, 3.91, and 4.02 per 100 women-years, respectively. HIV incidence in the 0.5% PRO2000 gel arm was lower than the placebo gel arm (hazard ratio = 0.7, P = 0.10) and the no gel arm (hazard ratio = 0.67, P = 0.06). HIV incidence rates were similar in the BufferGel and both placebo gel (hazard ratio = 1.10, P = 0.63) and no gel control arms (hazard ratio = 1.05, P = 0.78). HIV incidence was similar in the placebo gel and no gel arms (hazard ratio = 0.97, P = 0.89).

conclusionThe 0.5% PRO2000 gel demonstrated a modest 30% reduction in HIV acquisition in women. However, these results were not statistically significant and subsequent findings from the Microbicide Development Programme (MDP) 301 trial have confirmed that 0.5% PRO2000 gel has little or no protective effect. BufferGel did not alter the risk of HIV infection. Both products were well tolerated.

Indexed as

HIV-1Acrylic ResinsAdministration, IntravaginalAdolescentAdultAfricaAnti-Infective AgentsBlotting, WesternFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMiddle AgedNaphthalenesulfonatesPolymersSexual BehaviorUnited StatesAcrylic ResinsAnti-Infective AgentsBufferGelNaphthalenesulfonatesPolymersPRO 2000

Identifiers

PMID21330907
PMCPMC3083640
OpenAlexW2025396127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.