Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21330580›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2011

Concerns of newborn blood screening advisory committee members regarding storage and use of residual newborn screening blood spots.

Erin W Rothwell, Rebecca A Anderson, Matthew J Burbank, Aaron J Goldenberg, Michelle Huckaby Lewis, Louisa A Stark, Bob Wong, Jeffrey R Botkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Content of First Prenatal Visits.Maternal and child health journal · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erin W RothwellCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. erin.rothwell@nurs.utah.edu
Rebecca A Anderson
Matthew J Burbank
Aaron J Goldenberg
Michelle Huckaby Lewis
Louisa A Stark
Bob Wong
Jeffrey R Botkin

Funding

Methods for Promoting Public Dialogue on the Use of Residual Newborn Screening SaR01HG004970 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BOTKIN, JEFFREY R. · 2008 to 2010
$1.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004970NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG004970-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe assessed attitudes and opinions of members of newborn blood screening (NBS) advisory committees regarding the storage and secondary research use of residual specimens from NBS.

methodsWe conducted focus groups in 2008 and 2009 with NBS advisory committees (4 focus groups; n = 39 participants) in the Mountain States region (i.e., AZ, CO, MT, NM, NV, TX, UT, and WY).

resultsParticipants identified several challenges to implementing policies for storage of and research on residual newborn blood specimens. Themes that emerged from the data were public health relevancy; improvement of parental knowledge; impact of enhanced parental involvement; concerns over ownership, privacy, and confidentiality; identification of secondary research uses; and role of advisory committees.

conclusionsParticipants indicated that secondary uses of residual specimens entailed opportunities for improvements in NBS programs but also carried significant risks for their programs. Addressing concerns from stakeholders will be necessary for state-level adoption of national recommendations.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesBiomedical ResearchBlood Specimen CollectionConfidentialityFocus GroupsHealth EducationHumansInfant, NewbornNeonatal ScreeningOwnershipParentsPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID21330580
PMCPMC3222413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.