Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21329650›Full record

ArticleAnalytical biochemistry2011

In vitro studies of DNA mismatch repair proteins.

Hui Geng, Chunwei Du, Siying Chen, Vincenzo Salerno, Candela Manfredi, Peggy Hsieh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical biochemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Dynamic human MutSα-MutLα complexes compact mismatched DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hui GengGenetics & Biochemistry Branch, National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Chunwei Du
Siying Chen
Vincenzo Salerno
Candela Manfredi
Peggy Hsieh
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

DNA Mismatch RepairZIADK052030 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI HSIEH, PEGGY · 2009 to 2014
$3.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DK052030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to monitor and characterize DNA mismatch repair activity in various mammalian cells is important for understanding mechanisms involved in mutagenesis and tumorigenesis. Since mismatch repair proteins recognize mismatches containing both normal and chemically altered or damaged bases, in vitro assays must accommodate a variety of mismatches in different sequence contexts. Here we describe the construction of DNA mismatch substrates containing G:T or O(6)meG:T mismatches, the purification of recombinant native human MutSα (MSH2-MSH6) and MutLα (MLH1-PMS2) proteins, and in vitro mismatch repair and excision assays that can be adapted to study mismatch repair in nuclear extracts from mismatch repair proficient and deficient cells.

Indexed as

DNA Mismatch RepairBase SequenceCell LineDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesHumansMutL ProteinsPolynucleotidesRecombinant ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesG-T mismatch-binding proteinMutLalpha protein, humanMutL ProteinsPolynucleotidesRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21329650
PMCPMC3081888
OpenAlexW2024220597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.