ReviewDrugs & aging2011
Optimal pharmacotherapeutic management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: considerations in the elderly.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Canadian evidence-based guideline for the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2018Guideline
- Trial
- First-line treatment for CLL in the era of targeted therapy.Blood cancer journal · 2026Review
- Improved survival for patients diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the era of chemo-immunotherapy: a Danish population-based study of 10455 patients.Blood cancer journal · 2016Article
- Novel and emerging targeted-based cancer therapy agents and methods.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015Review
- Development of a comprehensive prognostic index for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Blood · 2014Article
- Obinutuzumab: first global approval.Drugs · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the majority of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) are of advanced age, these patients have not been well represented in past clinical trials. This has resulted in a lack of evidence that has complicated treatment in this patient group. However, data from an increasing number of subgroup analyses of recent trials as well as from trials specifically designed for elderly patients with CLL have provided some insight into the feasibility of the available treatments, thus allowing development of the first evidence-based recommendations for the pharmacotherapeutic management of these patients. Physically fit patients without significant co-morbidity are likely to benefit from the standard treatment of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR). However, whether treatment with purine analogues and/or CD20 antibodies is also beneficial in physically unfit patients suffering from additional health problems remains to be determined. Latest data suggest that the alkylating drug chlorambucil rather than fludarabine is a reasonable chemotherapeutic backbone for chemoimmunotherapy in these patients. Trials are now underway to investigate combinations of chlorambucil with rituximab or with novel CD20 antibodies (GA101 [afutuzumab], ofatumumab) in older CLL patients. In parallel, other regimens, including bendamustine or lenalidomide with or without the addition of rituximab, low-dose fludarabine and low-dose FCR, hold promise in elderly patients with previously untreated or relapsed CLL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21329399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.