SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011
Certolizumab pegol (CDP870) for rheumatoid arthritis in adults.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Certolizumab pegol (CDP870) for rheumatoid arthritis in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Withdrawal of biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical rheumatology · 2016Pooled it
- Safety Profile of Certolizumab Pegol in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Drug safety · 2015Pooled it
- Balneotherapy (or spa therapy) for rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Association between anti-TNF therapy for rheumatoid arthritis and hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Medicine · 2015Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of infliximab-biosimilar compared to other biological drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a mixed treatment comparison.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2014Pooled it
- Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia in rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- [Systematic literature research for S1 guidelines on sequential medical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2012Pooled it
- Adverse effects of biologics: a network meta-analysis and Cochrane overview.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Trial
- Economic Burden of Patients with Inadequate Response to Targeted Immunomodulators for Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2018Article
- Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?BMC medical research methodology · 2016Article
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Monoclonal Antibodies Approved to Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2015Review
- Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors - state of knowledge.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2014Article
- Active axial spondyloarthritis: potential role of certolizumab pegol.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2014Review
- Polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis - epidemiology and management approaches.Clinical epidemiology · 2014Review
- Updates on Psoriasis and Cutaneous Oncology: Proceedings from the 2013 MauiDerm Meeting.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2013Article
- Update on the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2013Review
- A safety analysis of oral prednisone as a pretreatment for rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTNF-alpha inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of joint damage and improve physical function and quality of life in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This is the first Cochrane review of certolizumab pegol, a new TNF-alpha inhibitor.
objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of certolizumab pegol (CDP870) in patients with RA who have not responded well to conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2009), EMBASE (1966 to November 2009), Scopus (January 2004 to November 2009), TOXLINE (until November 2009), Web of Knowledge (until November 2009); websites of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA) (until November 2009), and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials that compared certolizumab pegol with any other agent including placebo or methotrexate (MTX) in adult RA patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite current or prior treatment with conventional DMARDs, such as methotrexate (MTX). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed search results, trial quality and extracted data. MAIN
resultsFive trials were included. We included in the analysis 2394 people for effectiveness and 2094 people for safety. The duration of follow-up was from 12 to 52 weeks, and the range of doses of certolizumab pegol were from 50 to 400 mg subcutaneously (sc). In three trials the control was placebo plus methotrexate (MTX) and in two trials it was just placebo. Significant improvements were observed at 24 weeks with the approved dose of 200 mg certolizumab pegol: American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50% improvement: risk ratio (RR) 6.01 (95% CI 3.84 to 9.40) with an absolute benefit of 29% (95% CI 25% to 34%), number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) of 4 (3 to 5) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) mean difference (MD) - 0.39 (95% CI -0.45 to -0.32) (scale 0 to 3). At 52 weeks the results were quite similar: ACR 50% improvement RR 5.27 (95% CI 3.19 to 8.71), HAQ mean difference (MD) - 0.42 (95% CI -0.52 to -0.32). Serious adverse events were more frequent for certolizumab pegol 200 mg, Peto OR 2.02 (95% CI 1.24 to 3.30). The most common adverse events with certolizumab pegol 200 mg were: upper respiratory tract infections, Peto OR 2.21 (95% CI 1.15 to 4.25); hypertension, Peto OR 2.81 (95% CI 1.38 to 5.75); and nasopharyngitis, Peto OR 2.71 (95% CI 1.30 to 5.66). AUTHORS'
conclusionsWith an overall high grade of evidence this review revealed an improvement of clinical results (ACR50, 28 joint disease activity score (DAS-28) remission and HAQ scores) with certolizumab pegol. Adverse events were more frequent with certolizumab; there was a statistically significant increase in the number of serious adverse events, infections and hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.