SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011
Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Development and validation of the patient-rated ulnar nerve evaluation.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2013Trial
- Work Disabling Nerve Injury at Both Elbows Due to Laptop Use at Flexible Workplaces inside an Office: Case-Report of a Bilateral Ulnar Neuropathy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Anconeus Epitrochlearis Muscle Associated With Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Case Series.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- Conservative treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: A systematic review.Orthopedic reviews · 2019Article
- Ulnar Nerve In Situ Decompression versus Transposition for Idiopathic Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: An Updated Meta-Analysis.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2019Article
- Comparison of Surgical Encounter Direct Costs for Three Methods of Cubital Tunnel Decompression.Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2019Article
- Patient-Related Risk Factors for Infection Following Ulnar Nerve Release at the Cubital Tunnel: An Analysis of 15,188 Cases.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2018Article
- Surgical Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Trends and the Influence of Patient and Surgeon Characteristics.The Journal of hand surgery · 2015Article
- A 37-year-old man with numbness in the hand.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2015Article
- Ulnar nerve morbidity as a long-term complication of pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2014Article
- Predictors of functional outcomes after simple decompression for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a multicenter study by the SUN study group.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2014Article
- Minimal-incision in situ ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow.Hand clinics · 2014Review
- An outcome study for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a multicenter study by the surgery for ulnar nerve (SUN) study group.Neurosurgery · 2013Article
- Trend of recovery after simple decompression for treatment of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2013Article
- Treatment of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: cost-utility analysis.The Journal of hand surgery · 2012Article
- Compressive neuropathy in the upper limb.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUlnar neuropathy at the elbow is the second most common entrapment neuropathy after carpal tunnel syndrome. Treatment may be conservative or surgical but optimal management remains controversial.
objectivesThe objectives of this systematic review were to determine the effectiveness and safety of conservative and surgical treatments in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (16 February 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 1), MEDLINE (January 1966 to February 2010), EMBASE (January 1980 to February 2010), AMED (January 1985 to February 2010), CINAHL Plus (January 1937 to February 2010), LILACS (January 1982 to Feburary 2010), PEDro (January 1980 to February 2010), and the papers cited in relevant reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: The review included only randomised controlled clinical trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently reviewed titles and abstracts of references retrieved from the searches and selected all potentially relevant studies. The authors extracted data from included trials and assessed trial quality independently. They contacted trial investigators for missing information. MAIN
resultsWe identified 1461 papers and selected six randomised controlled clinical trials with moderate quality evidence. The sequence generation was not adequate in one study and not described in two studies. We performed two meta-analyses to evaluate the clinical and neurophysiological outcomes of simple decompression versus decompression with submuscular or subcutaneous transposition.We found no difference between simple decompression and transposition of the ulnar nerve for both clinical improvement (risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.08) and neurophysiological improvement (RR 1.47, 95% CI -0.94 to 3.87). Transposition showed a higher number of wound infections (RR 3.10, 95% CI 1.18 to 8.15).In one trial the authors compared medial epicondylectomy with anterior transposition and found no difference in the clinical and neurophysiological outcomes.One trial assessed conservative treatment in clinically mild or moderate ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. The authors found that information on avoiding prolonged movements or positions was effective in improving subjective discomfort. Night splinting and nerve gliding exercises in addition to the information did not produce further improvement. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThe available evidence is not sufficient to identify the best treatment for idiopathic ulnar neuropathy at the elbow on the basis of clinical, neurophysiological and imaging characteristics. We do not know when to treat a patient conservatively or surgically. However, the results of our meta-analysis suggest that simple decompression and decompression with transposition are equally effective in idiopathic ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, including when the nerve impairment is severe. In mild cases, evidence from one small randomised controlled trial of conservative treatment showed that information on movements or positions to avoid may reduce subjective discomfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.