Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21328280›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011

Lamotrigine for acute and chronic pain.

Philip J Wiffen, Sheena Derry, R Andrew Moore

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. 2017 HIVMA of IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Chronic Pain in Patients Living With HIV.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Guideline
  4. Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Lamotrigine for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Topiramate for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  8. Clonazepam for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  9. Phenytoin for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  10. Lacosamide for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Guideline
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philip J WiffenUK Cochrane Centre, National Institute for Health Research, Summertown Pavilion, Middle Way, Oxford, UK, OX2 7LG.
Sheena Derry
R Andrew Moore
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis is an update of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 2, 2007. Some antiepileptic medicines have a place in the treatment of neuropathic pain (pain due to nerve damage). This updated review adds five new additional studies looking at evidence for Lamotrigine as an effective treatment for acute and chronic pain.

objectivesTo assess analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of the antiepileptic drug lamotrigine in acute and chronic pain. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of lamotrigine in acute, and chronic pain (including cancer pain) were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL up to January 2011. Additional studies were sought from the reference list of the retrieved papers. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs investigating the use of lamotrigine (any dose, by any route, and for any study duration) for the treatment of acute or chronic pain. Assessment of pain intensity or pain relief, or both, using validated scales. Participants were adults aged 18 and over. Only full journal publication articles were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Dichotomous data (ideally for the outcome of at least 50% pain relief) were used to calculate relative risk with 95% confidence intervals. Meta-analysis was undertaken using a fixed-effect model. Numbers needed to treat to benefit (NNTs) were calculated as the reciprocal of the absolute risk reduction. For unwanted effects, the NNT becomes the number needed to harm (NNH) and was calculated. MAIN

resultsTwelve included studies in 11 publications (1511 participants), all with chronic neuropathic pain: central post stroke pain (1), chemotherapy induced neuropathic pain (1), diabetic neuropathy (4), HIV related neuropathy (2), mixed neuropathic pain (2), spinal cord injury related pain (1), and trigeminal neuralgia (1); none investigated lamotrigine in acute pain. The update had five additional studies (1111 additional participants). Participants were aged between 26 and 77 years. Study duration was 2 weeks in one study and at least 6 weeks in the remainder; eight were of eight week duration or longer. There is no convincing evidence that lamotrigine is effective in treating acute or chronic pain at doses of about 200-400 mg daily. Almost 10% of participants taking lamotrigine reported a skin rash. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe additional studies tripled participant numbers providing data for analysis, and new, more stringent criteria for outcomes and analysis were used; conclusions about lamotrigine's lack of efficacy in chronic pain did not change. Given availability of more effective treatments including antiepileptics and antidepressant medicines, lamotrigine does not have a significant place in therapy based on available evidence.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAnalgesicsChronic DiseaseHumansLamotriginePainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTriazinesAnalgesicsLamotrigineTriazines

Identifiers

PMID21328280
PMCPMC4161113
OpenAlexW1900662348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.