Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21328252›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011

Intermittent pneumatic compression for treating venous leg ulcers.

E Andrea Nelson, Raj Mani, Kate Thomas, Kathryn Vowden

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CHIVA method for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. CHIVA method for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Compression for venous leg ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Compression therapy for venous leg ulcers.Indian dermatology online journal · 2014
    Article
  14. Venous ulcers of the lower limb: Where do we stand?Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

E Andrea NelsonSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Baines Wing, Leeds, UK, LS2 9UT.
Raj Mani
Kate Thomas
Kathryn Vowden
Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBHampton University · USUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) is a mechanical method of delivering compression to swollen limbs that can be used to treat venous leg ulcers and limb swelling due to lymphoedema.

objectivesTo determine whether IPC increases the healing of venous leg ulcers. To determine the effects of IPC on health related quality of life of venous leg ulcer patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: For this update we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 10 December 2010); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 4); Ovid MEDLINE  (2007 to November Week 3 2010); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations December 09, 2010); Ovid EMBASE (2007 to 2010 Week 48); and EBSCO CINAHL (2007 to 3 December 2010). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of IPC with control (sham IPC or no IPC) or made comparisons between IPC treatment regimens, in venous ulcer management. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both review authors reviewed titles and abstracts and agreed on full studies to be retrieved. One review author extracted data and assessed studies for risk of bias and this was checked by a second review author. MAIN

resultsWe identified seven randomised controlled trials (including 367 people in total). Only one trial was at low risk of bias having reported adequate randomisation, allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessment. In one trial (80 people) more ulcers healed with IPC than with dressings (62% vs 28%; p=0.002). Four trials compared IPC plus compression with compression alone. The first of these trials (45 people) found increased ulcer healing with IPC plus compression than with compression alone (risk ratio for healing 11.4, 95% Confidence Interval 1.6 to 82). The remaining three trials (122 people) found no evidence of a benefit for IPC plus compression compared with compression alone.One small trial (16 people) found no difference between IPC (without additional compression) and compression bandages alone. One trial (104 people) compared different ways of delivering IPC and found that rapid IPC healed more ulcers than slow IPC (86% vs 61%). AUTHORS'

conclusionsIPC may increase healing compared with no compression, but it is not clear whether it increases healing when added to treatment with bandages, or if it can be used instead of compression bandages. Rapid IPC was better than slow IPC in one trial. Further trials are required to determine whether IPC increases the healing of venous leg ulcers when used in modern practice where compression therapy is widely used.

Indexed as

BandagesIntermittent Pneumatic Compression DevicesAirHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStockings, CompressionVaricose UlcerWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID21328252
OpenAlexW4234377217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.