ArticleInternational ophthalmology2011
A rare case of peripartum endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metastatic endophthalmitis - Has the trend of causative organism changed in the modern antibiotic era - A Systematic Review.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyPooled it
- Bilateral Endophthalmitis in a Postpartum Immunocompetent Patient.Case reports in ophthalmological medicine · 2024Article
- Culture-proven endogenous endophthalmitis: microbiological and clinical survey.International ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Endogenous endophthalmitis due toIndian journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Commentary: Peripartum endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis: A conundrum.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- FulminantBMJ case reports · 2019Review
- Review of endogenous endophthalmitis during pregnancy including case series.International ophthalmology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We describe the case of a healthy, pregnant female who developed endogenous endophthalmitis at the time of delivery, and discuss the possible mechanism of infection and the management of this case. A 26-year-old Asian woman presented with a 3-week history of visual deterioration and pain in the right eye. There was no history of ocular trauma or surgery. The ocular symptoms developed one day after vaginal delivery of a healthy baby. The pregnancy had been uncomplicated until premature rupture of membranes one week prior to delivery. Right visual acuity was light perception. There was marked right anterior chamber activity with a hypopyon and fibrin. A B-scan ultrasound showed dense vitritis. Examination of the left eye was normal. Blood tests and a chest X-ray were normal. A vitreous tap was performed and bacterial culture grew Sphingomonas paucimobilis. Intravitreal antibiotics were injected (amikacin 0.4 mg/0.1 ml and vancomycin 2.0 mg/0.1 ml) and the patient was treated with oral moxifloxacin and corticosteroids. Right visual acuity improved to 6/9. This case highlights the need for clinicians to have a high level of awareness of endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis (a rare, potentially sight-threatening condition) in any patient with a painful eye or visual deterioration in the peripartum period, particularly if associated with complications such as premature rupture of membranes or perineal laceration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.