ArticleWorld journal of urology2011
Efficacy of propiverine ER with or without α-blockers related to maximum urinary flow rate in adult men with OAB: results of a 12-week, multicenter, non-interventional study.
Article in World journal of urology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- What Are Realistic Expectations to Become Free of Overactive Bladder Symptoms? Experience from Non-interventional Studies with Propiverine.Advances in therapy · 2022Article
- Factors Associated with Decisions for Initial Dosing, Up-Titration of Propiverine and Treatment Outcomes in Overactive Bladder Syndrome Patients in a Non-Interventional Setting.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Overactive bladder in elderly men: epidemiology, evaluation, clinical effects, and management.Current urology reports · 2013Review
- Propiverine: a review of its use in the treatment of adults and children with overactive bladder associated with idiopathic or neurogenic detrusor overactivity, and in men with lower urinary tract symptoms.Clinical drug investigation · 2013Review
- Acetylcholine for male LUTS.Current urology reports · 2012Review
- The muscarinic receptor antagonist propiverine exhibits α(1)-adrenoceptor antagonism in human prostate and porcine trigonum.World journal of urology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeComparison of efficacy of propiverine extended release (ER) 30 mg o.d. in the treatment of male OAB administered as monotherapy (MT) or add-on to α-blockers (combination treatment, CT) in relation to maximum urinary flow (Q(max)) in a non-interventional study.
methodsMen ≥40 years with OAB symptoms, Q(max) ≥10 ml/s, prostate volume <40 ml, post-void residuals (PVR) <100 ml, and IPSS <20 were included. OAB symptoms, IPSS, and PVR were recorded before and after 12 weeks of treatment. Participants were stratified by Q(max) (group A ≥15 ml/s, group B <15 ml/s) and CT vs. MT. Safety parameters were monitored.
resultsA total of 2,219 men participated and were involved in safety analysis; 1,849 men (mean age 66 years) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were involved in efficacy analysis. In group A, 291 men received MT and 479 CT; in group B, 184 men received MT and 895 CT. OAB symptoms improved significantly in all groups throughout the study without differences between MT and CT. IPSS improvement in group B was less with MT than with CT (-3.9 vs. -5.2; P < 0.001), whereas IPSS improvement was similar in group A (-4.6 vs. -5.1). Mean PVR change was not clinically relevant, but two men (0.1%) experienced urinary retention.
conclusionsUnder real-life conditions, treatment of OAB symptoms with propiverine ER is equally effective in men with MT or CT regardless of baseline Q(max). In men with reduced Q(max), IPSS improvement is significantly smaller with MT. The incidence of urinary retention during propiverine ER treatment is low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.