Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21327569›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2011

Growth factors and neuropathic pain.

Michael H Ossipov

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Stem cell therapy in pain medicine.The Korean journal of pain · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael H OssipovDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, PO Box 245050, Tucson, AZ 85724-5050, USA. michaelo@email.arizona.edu
University of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A treatment for neuropathic pain is an important unmet medical need because this pain often is refractory to many medical interventions. An important element in the development of neuropathic pain is a dysfunction in the activity of peripheral nerves. Because neurotrophic factors affect nerve development and maintenance, modulating the activity of these factors can alter neuronal pathophysiology and produce a disease-modifying effect. Blocking the activity of nerve growth factor or enhancing the activity of either glial-derived neurotrophic factor or artemin has shown potential for normalizing neuronal activity and attenuating signs of neuropathic pain in animal models and clinical studies. This article discusses the role of these factors in neuropathic pain and the implications for the development of novel therapeutics.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnimalsGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic FactorHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsNerve Growth FactorNerve Growth FactorsNeuralgiaAnalgesicsGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic FactorIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsNerve Growth FactorNerve Growth Factors

Identifiers

PMID21327569
OpenAlexW2046345026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.