Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21327422›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2011

Gastrointestinal safety of triflusal solution in healthy volunteers: a proof of concept endoscopic study.

Rosa M Antonijoan, Ignasi Gich, Analia Azaro, Sergio Sainz, Joaquim Balanzó, Iñaki Izquierdo, Javier Borja, Esther Donado, Iris Blanch, Manel J Barbanoj

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02616497 (Comparison of Triflusal With Aspirin in the Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Events), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02616497 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Triflusal With Aspirin in the Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Events

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of IoanninaRan2015 to 2018Enrolled1,220ConditionsAtherothrombosisArmsAspirin, Triflusal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosa M AntonijoanClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Ignasi Gich
Analia Azaro
Sergio Sainz
Joaquim Balanzó
Iñaki Izquierdo
Javier Borja
Esther Donado
Iris Blanch
Manel J Barbanoj
Hospital de Sant Pau · ESUriach (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTriflusal is an antiplatelet agent that irreversibly acetylates cyclooxygenase isoform 1 (COX-1) and therefore inhibits thromboxane biosynthesis. It was initially marketed as capsules containing 300 mg of active substance. In 2006 a new 600 mg (10 ml) oral solution form of triflusal was authorized in Spain. The primary aim of this study was to compare the gastrointestinal safety of the new triflusal oral solution with triflusal capsules in healthy volunteers.

methodsSixty healthy subjects were randomly assigned, in a 2.5:2.5: 1 ratio, into one of three groups, with 25 subjects receiving one bottle of triflusal oral solution (600 mg) daily, 25 subjects receiving two triflusal capsules (600 mg) once daily, and ten subjects receiving two placebo capsules once daily, respectively, during 7 consecutive days. Gastroscopy was performed at baseline before the administration of study drugs and after 4-8 h of the last dose of study drugs. Effects on the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum were measured in accordance with a modified Lanza scale.

resultsNo differences between groups were detected at baseline. After treatment, median global scores in the placebo, triflusal solution, and triflusal capsules groups were, respectively, 0, 1, and 3 (p = 0.003 for comparison between placebo and triflusal capsules and p = 0.042 for comparison between triflusal solution and triflusal capsules). There were no significant differences between the scores on the triflusal solution and placebo groups. All treatments were well tolerated.

conclusionIn healthy subjects, triflusal solution induced less endoscopically apparent gastrointestinal mucosal damage than triflusal capsules and did not induce more damage than the placebo in healthy volunteers.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultCapsulesDouble-Blind MethodEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleGastric MucosaGastrointestinal TractHumansMalePlatelet AggregationPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsSalicylatesSpainStatistics as TopicTherapeutic EquivalencyCapsulesPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsSalicylatestriflusal

Identifiers

PMID21327422
OpenAlexW2029022563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.