Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21327066›Full record

ReviewNucleus (Austin, Tex.)

The intricacy of nuclear membrane dynamics during nucleophagy.

Dalibor Mijaljica, Mark Prescott, Rodney J Devenish

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The emerging mechanisms and functions of microautophagy.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Autophagy of the Nucleus in Health and Disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Modulation of protein quality control systems by food phytochemicals.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dalibor MijaljicaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Mark Prescott
Rodney J Devenish

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cell nucleus is an organelle bounded by a double-membrane which undergoes drastic reorganization during major cellular events such as cell division and apoptosis. Maintenance of proper nuclear structure, function and dynamics is central to organelle vitality. Over recent years growing evidence has shown that parts of the nucleus can be specifically degraded by an autophagic process termed nucleophagy. The process is best described in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where piecemeal microautophagy of the nucleus or nucleophagy (micronucleophagy) requires direct interaction of the nuclear membrane with that of the vacuole (the yeast lytic compartment). Here, we review the process of nucleophagy in the context of nuclear membrane dynamics, and examine the evidence for autophagic degradation of the nucleus in mammalian cells. Finally, we discuss the importance of nucleophagy as a 'housecleaning' mechanism for the nucleus under both normal and disease conditions.

Indexed as

AutophagyAnimalsHumansNuclear EnvelopeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeautophagymammalian cellsmembranenuclear componentsnuclear envelopenucleophagynucleusyeast

Identifiers

PMID21327066
PMCPMC3027025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.