ReviewBioengineered bugs
Live, attenuated strains of Listeria and Salmonella as vaccine vectors in cancer treatment.
Review in Bioengineered bugs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leveraging the bacteria for enhanced cancer immunotherapy: from a perspective of synthetic biology.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Review
- Bacterial-based cancer therapy: mechanisms and therapeutic advances.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Immune-Centered Cross-Talk Between Cancer Cells and the Tumor Microenvironment-Implications for Therapy.Cancers · 2026Review
- Article
- Commensal microbiome and gastrointestinal mucosal immunity: Harmony and conflict with our closest neighbor.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2024Review
- Cytosolic bacterial pathogens activate TLR pathways in tumors that synergistically enhance STING agonist cancer therapies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Review
- Recent Advances in Bacteria-Based Cancer Treatment.Cancers · 2022Review
- Streptococcal bacterial components in cancer therapy.Cancer gene therapy · 2022Review
- Hacking Commensal Bacteria to Consolidate the Adaptive Mucosal Immune Response in the Gut-Lung Axis: Future Possibilities for SARS-CoV-2 Protection.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2022Review
- Live Bacterial Vectors-A Promising DNA Vaccine Delivery System.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Attenuated Bacteria as Immunotherapeutic Tools for Cancer Treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2018Article
- Lessons Learned from Protective Immune Responses to Optimize Vaccines against Cryptosporidiosis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Dendritic cell therapy in melanoma.Annals of translational medicine · 2017Review
- Mechanistic insights into ADXS11-001 human papillomavirus-associated cancer immunotherapy.Gynecologic oncology research and practice · 2017Review
- Enhancing vaccine effectiveness with delivery technology.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2016Review
- Article
- Listeria monocytogenes mutants defective in gallbladder replication represent safety-enhanced vaccine delivery platforms.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016Article
- Article
- Bacteria in Cancer Therapy: Renaissance of an Old Concept.International journal of microbiology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Live, attenuated strains of many bacteria that synthesize and secrete foreign antigens are being developed as vaccines for a number of infectious diseases and cancer. Bacterial-based vaccines provide a number of advantages over other antigen delivery strategies including low cost of production, the absence of animal products, genetic stability and safety. In addition, bacterial vaccines delivering a tumor-associated antigen (TAA) stimulate innate immunity and also activate both arms of the adaptive immune system by which they exert efficacious anti-tumor effects. Listeria monocytogenes and several strains of Salmonella have been most extensively studied for this purpose. A number of attenuated strains have been generated and used to deliver antigens associated with infectious diseases and cancer. Although both bacteria are intracellular, the immune responses invoked by Listeria and Salmonella are different due to their sub-cellular locations. Upon entering antigen-presenting cells by phagocytosis, Listeria is capable of escaping from the phagosomal compartment and thus has direct access to the cell cytosol. Proteins delivered by this vector behave as endogenous antigens, are presented on the cell surface in the context of MHC class I molecules, and generate strong cell-mediated immune responses. In contrast, proteins delivered by Salmonella, which lacks a phagosomal escape mechanism, are treated as exogenous antigens and presented by MHC class II molecules resulting predominantly in Th2 type immune responses. This fundamental disparity between the life cycles of the two vectors accounts for their differential application as antigen delivery vehicles. The present paper includes a review of the most recent advances in the development of these two bacterial vectors for treatment of cancer. Similarities and differences between the two vectors are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.