Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21326628›Full record

ArticleJournal of Cancer2011

Patients with localised prostate cancer (t1 - t2) show improved overall long-term survival compared to the normal population.

Michael J Mathers, Stephan Roth, Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, Michael Gerken, Ferdinand Hofstaedter, Stefan Wilm, Theodor Klotz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fast [EJNMMI physics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. High rate of 5-year survival among patients with early gastric cancer undergoing curative endoscopic submucosal dissection.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2016
    Article
  7. Lifetime economic burden of prostate cancer.BMC health services research · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J Mathers1. Urologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Remscheid in cooperation with Helios Clinic Wuppertal, Universitiy Witten/Herdecke, Germany.
Stephan Roth
Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
Michael Gerken
Ferdinand Hofstaedter
Stefan Wilm
Theodor Klotz
Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal · DEKlinikum Weiden · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle information is available on the long-term outcomes of patients with localised prostate cancer.

objectiveTo examine the long-term survival of patients with localised prostate gland carcinoma T1 - T2, N0, M0 (UICC stage I and II) compared to the normal population.

designRetrospective cohort.

settingRegensburg, Germany.

participantsData on 2121 patients with histologically-confirmed, localised prostate cancer diagnosed between 1998 and 2007 were extracted from the cancer registry of the tumour centre in Regensburg, Germany. MEASUREMENTS: Overall survival rate in the patient cohort was estimated and compared to the expected survival rate of a comparable group in the general population derived from the official life-tables of Germany stratified by age, sex and calendar year.

resultsTen years after diagnosis, patients with stage I and II localised prostate gland carcinoma had an approximately 10% increase in survival compared to the normal male population (Relative Survival = 110.7%, 95%-CI 106.6 - 114.8%). LIMITATIONS: We did not examine the effect of cancer treatment or cancer aggressiveness on the overall survival of patients. We did not assess the incidence of subsequent non-primary cancers in our patient population or how this incidence affects the patients' follow-up care and survival.

conclusionsPatients with stage I+II localised prostate gland carcinoma have improved survival compared with the normal male population. This finding cannot be explained solely by the administration of prostate carcinoma treatments, suggesting that men who participate in PSA screening may have better overall health behaviors and care than men who do not participate in screening. Future research should examine how treatment choice, especially an "active surveillance" approach to care, affects survival in these patients more than ten years after diagnosis.

Indexed as

health statusoutcomes researchprostate cancerPSAsocial gradient of prevention

Identifiers

PMID21326628
PMCPMC3039224
OpenAlexW2095722893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.