Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21326270›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2011

Study to investigate the potential of probiotics in children attending school.

D Merenstein, J Gonzalez, A G Young, R F Roberts, M E Sanders, S Petterson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Nutrients · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Acute Infectious Diarrhea.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Administration ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Probiotics in Children: What Is the Evidence?Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D MerensteinDepartment of Family Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
J Gonzalez
A G Young
R F Roberts
M E Sanders
S Petterson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesTo determine if consumption of yogurt containing a high dose of probiotic (1×10(10) colony-forming unit per 100 ml), Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (B. lactis), decreases absences in children 2-4 years attending daycare/school centers. SUBJECTS/

methodsWe conducted a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, allocation concealment clinical trial in the Washington, DC area. Our active intervention was a strawberry yogurt-based drink supplemented with B. lactis BB-12. The placebo was indistinguishable from the active drink, differing only in absence of the probiotic BB-12.

resultsA total of 172 children between the ages of 2 and 4 from the Washington, DC area were enrolled. The primary outcome, missed days of school because of illness per 100 days, was similar in both the active (2.54 days absent/100 school days) and control groups (2.42 days absent/100 school days) (P=0.873).

conclusionsThe probiotic-containing yogurt-based beverage studied did not decrease absences because of illnesses in daycare/school for healthy children ages 2-4 years.

Indexed as

BifidobacteriumSchools, NurseryAbsenteeismBeveragesChild, PreschoolColony Count, MicrobialDistrict of ColumbiaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFood, FortifiedHumansMaleProbioticsSocioeconomic FactorsStem CellsYogurt

Identifiers

PMID21326270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.