Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21325996›Full record

SynthesisTransplantation2011

Age, exclusion criteria, and generalizability of randomized trials enrolling kidney transplant recipients.

Christopher D Blosser, Ari Huverserian, Roy D Bloom, Peter D Abt, Simin Goral, Arwin Thomasson, Justine Shults, Peter P Reese

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Transplantation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. CTLA4-Ig prolongs graft survival specifically in young but not old mice.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Age-Dependent Metabolic and Immunosuppressive Effects of Tacrolimus.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Lower calcineurin inhibitor doses in older compared to younger kidney transplant recipients yield similar troughs.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher D BlosserDepartment of Medicine, Renal Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021, USA.
Ari Huverserian
Roy D Bloom
Peter D Abt
Simin Goral
Arwin Thomasson
Justine Shults
Peter P Reese

Funding

Renal &Urologic Biostatistics Training GrantT32DK060455 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHULTS, JUSTINE · 2003 to 2019
$1.9M
Measuring Living Kidney Transplantation at Renal Transplant CentersK23DK078688 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REESE, PETER PHILIP · 2007 to 2011
$658k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK078688NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK060455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe proportion of elderly (≥65 years) kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) doubled in the United States from 1999 to 2008. Given higher mortality, more medication side effects, and less rejection among elderly KTRs, optimal care of these patients may require tailored decisions about transplant therapeutics. It is unknown whether participants in transplant clinical trials-which generate the best evidence for patient care-are representative of the aging population of KTRs.

methodsUsing PubMed, we identified randomized trials involving KTRs from 1999 to 2008 and determined age-exclusion criteria and the mean age of participants. The mean age of these trial participants was compared with the mean age of the overall population of incident KTRs in the United States.

resultsThe 87,222 participants in 573 trials were significantly younger than the US KTR population (P<0.05). This age discrepancy worsened over the study period (during the years 2006 to 2008, the mean age was 45 years for trial participants versus 50 years for US KTRs, P<0.05). Thirty percent of trials had an exclusion criterion based on older age, and 16% excluded recipients aged 65 years or older. In multivariable regression, immunosuppression trials (P<0.01) and trials in higher impact journals (P=0.03) were more likely to exclude the elderly, but there was no significant difference in exclusion of elderly patients based on a trial's geographic location.

conclusionsTrial participants are younger than KTRs in the United States and many trials exclude older patients. Transplant investigators should make strong efforts to recruit patients across the total age spectrum.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationPatient SelectionAdultAgedAge FactorsChi-Square DistributionEvidence-Based MedicineHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedOdds RatioRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID21325996
PMCPMC3462443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.