Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21325542›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2011

International external quality assurance for laboratory identification and typing of Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B streptococci).

Baharak Afshar, Karen Broughton, Roberta Creti, Antoaneta Decheva, Markus Hufnagel, Paula Kriz, Lotte Lambertsen, Marguerite Lovgren, Pierrette Melin, Graziella Orefici and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Emergence of High-Level Gentamicin Resistance inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women: serotype and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns over five years in Eastern Sicily (Italy).European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Group BFrontiers in public health · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Baharak AfsharStreptococcus and Diphtheria Reference Unit, Respiratory and Systemic Infection Laboratory, Health Protection Agency, Microbiology Services Division, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, United Kingdom. Baharak.Afshar@hpa.org.uk
Karen Broughton
Roberta Creti
Antoaneta Decheva
Markus Hufnagel
Paula Kriz
Lotte Lambertsen
Marguerite Lovgren
Pierrette Melin
Graziella Orefici
Claire Poyart
Andreas Radtke
Javier Rodriguez-Granger
Uffe B Skov Sørensen
John Telford
Lea Valinsky
Levantia Zachariadou
Members of the DEVANI Study Group
Androulla Efstratiou

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the results from the first international multicenter external quality assessment (EQA) studies for molecular and serological typing of group B streptococcus (GBS) strains as part of DEVANI (Design of a Vaccine against Neonatal Infections), a pan-European program. A questionnaire-based surveillance was undertaken among eight laboratories participating in DEVANI and six laboratories not participating in DEVANI from 13 countries in order to assess their current microbiological procedures for GBS screening, diagnosis, and typing. GBS strains from three EQA distributions were characterized using molecular and serological methods based on GBS capsular polysaccharide typing. Participants were asked to test the first distribution using their current serotyping and genotyping methods. The Strep-B-Latex agglutination method was the most widely used method, with a typeability value of >90%. A multiplex PCR assay for GBS capsular gene typing was also used by 2 of 14 centers, which achieved a typeability value of 93%; this assay detected only 9 of 10 GBS capsular polysaccharide genes. From the second and third EQA studies, standardized protocols were prepared for serological and molecular typing of GBS strains based on the Strep-B-Latex agglutination method and a novel multiplex PCR assay that detected all 10 GBS capsular types (Ia to IX). These standardized protocols are being used by many European laboratories, and as the use of these methods increases, it is imperative to continuously improve and assess laboratory performance and offer training to any laboratories that have technical difficulties.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesBacteriological TechniquesEuropeFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInternational CooperationMaleMolecular TypingPregnancyQuality Assurance, Health CareSerotypingStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus agalactiae

Identifiers

PMID21325542
PMCPMC3122801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.