Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21325053›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

The population dynamics of bacteria in physically structured habitats and the adaptive virtue of random motility.

Yan Wei, Xiaolin Wang, Jingfang Liu, Ilya Nememan, Amoolya H Singh, Howie Weiss, Bruce R Levin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A shear-induced limit on bacterial surface adhesion in fluid flow.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Eco-evolutionary dynamics of experimentalMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Adaption ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  7. mLife · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Growth of bacteria in 3-d colonies.PLoS computational biology · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Natural search algorithms as a bridge between organisms, evolution, and ecology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evolution of coexistence in a crowded microplate well.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yan WeiDepartment of Biology, Graduate Program in Population Biology, Ecology, and Evolution, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Xiaolin Wang
Jingfang Liu
Ilya Nememan
Amoolya H Singh
Howie Weiss
Bruce R Levin

Funding

Theoretical and experimental strudy of the population and evolutionary dynamics oR01GM091875 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LEVIN, BRUCE RICHARD · 2009 to 2017
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 091875NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM091875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Why is motility so common in bacteria? An obvious answer to this ecological and evolutionary question is that in almost all habitats, bacteria need to go someplace and particularly in the direction of food. Although the machinery required for motility and chemotaxis (acquiring and processing the information needed to direct movement toward nutrients) are functionally coupled in contemporary bacteria, they are coded for by different sets of genes. Moreover, information that resources are more abundant elsewhere in a habitat would be of no value to a bacterium unless it already had the means to get there. Thus, motility must have evolved before chemotaxis, and bacteria with flagella and other machinery for propulsion in random directions must have an advantage over bacteria relegated to moving at the whim of external forces alone. However, what are the selection pressures responsible for the evolution and maintenance of undirected motility in bacteria? Here we use a combination of mathematical modeling and experiments with Escherichia coli to generate and test a parsimonious and ecologically general hypothesis for the existence of undirected motility in bacteria: it enables bacteria to move away from each other and thereby obtain greater individual shares of resources in physically structured environments. The results of our experiments not only support this hypothesis, but are quantitatively and qualitatively consistent with the predictions of our model.

Indexed as

EcosystemAdaptation, PhysiologicalEscherichia coliGenes, BacterialPopulation Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID21325053
PMCPMC3053974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.