Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21325028›Full record

ArticleJournal of cell science2011

Drosophila male germline stem cells do not asymmetrically segregate chromosome strands.

Swathi Yadlapalli, Jun Cheng, Yukiko M Yamashita

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cell science, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of asymmetric stem cell division in tissue homeostasis.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Epigenetic regulation of germ cells-remember or forget?Current opinion in genetics & development · 2015
    Review
  16. Stem cell decisions: a twist of fate or a niche market?Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Swathi YadlapalliLife Sciences Institute, Center for Stem Cell Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Jun Cheng
Yukiko M Yamashita
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Physiological regulation and function of asymmetric stem cell divisionR01GM086481 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI YAMASHITA, YUKIKO · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086481NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM086481-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult stem cells continuously supply differentiated cells throughout the life of organisms. This increases the risk of replicative senescence or neoplastic transformation due to mutations that accumulate over many rounds of DNA replication. The immortal strand hypothesis proposes that stem cells reduce the accumulation of replication-induced mutations by retaining the older template DNA strands. Other models have also been proposed in which stem cells asymmetrically segregate chromosome strands for other reasons, such as retention of epigenetic memories. Recently, the idea has emerged that the mother centrosome, which is stereotypically retained within some asymmetrically dividing stem cells, might be utilized as a means of asymmetrically segregating chromosome strands. We have tested this hypothesis in germline stem cells (GSCs) from Drosophila melanogaster testis, which undergo asymmetric divisions marked by the asymmetric segregation of centrosomes and the acquisition of distinct daughter cell fates (stem cell self-renewal versus differentiation). Using 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine labeling combined with direct visualization of GSC-gonialblast (differentiating daughter) pairs, we directly scored the outcome of chromosome strand segregation. Our data show that, in male GSCs in the Drosophila testis, chromosome strands are not asymmetrically segregated, despite asymmetrically segregating centrosomes. Our data demonstrate that asymmetric centrosome segregation in stem cells does not necessarily lead to asymmetric chromosome strand segregation.

Indexed as

Chromosome SegregationAnimalsChromosomes, InsectDrosophilaGerm CellsMaleStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID21325028
PMCPMC3048890
OpenAlexW2058850640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.