Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21325005›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2011

Association between C reactive protein and coronary heart disease: mendelian randomisation analysis based on individual participant data.

C Reactive Protein Coronary Heart Disease Genetics Collaboration (CCGC), Frances Wensley, Pei Gao, Stephen Burgess, Stephen Kaptoge, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Tina Shah, James C Engert, Robert Clarke, George Davey-Smith and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 302 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
302citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
35.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

302 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 650 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Guideline
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

242 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C Reactive Protein Coronary Heart Disease Genetics Collaboration (CCGC)
Frances Wensley
Pei Gao
Stephen Burgess
Stephen Kaptoge
Emanuele Di Angelantonio
Tina Shah
James C Engert
Robert Clarke
George Davey-Smith
Børge G Nordestgaard
Danish Saleheen
Nilesh J Samani
Manjinder Sandhu
Sonia Anand
Mark B Pepys
Liam Smeeth
John Whittaker
Juan Pablo Casas
Simon G Thompson
Aroon D Hingorani
John Danesh
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

MULTIDISCIPLINARY CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE (MCTS) PROGRAM (UL1)UL1RR025741 · NCRR · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GREENLAND, PHILIP · 2008 to 2011
$24.7M
British Heart Foundation FS05/125British Heart Foundation PG/07/083/22975British Heart Foundation RG/07/008/23674British Heart Foundation RG/08/008/25291British Heart Foundation RG/08/013/25942British Heart Foundation RG/08/014/24067British Heart Foundation SP/08/007British Heart Foundation SP/08/007/23628Medical Research Council G0100222Medical Research Council G0401527Medical Research Council G0600705Medical Research Council G0601966Medical Research Council G0700931Medical Research Council G0801056Medical Research Council G0801566Medical Research Council G0902037Medical Research Council G1000143Medical Research Council G19/35Medical Research Council G7900510Medical Research Council G8802774Medical Research Council MC_QA137933Medical Research Council MC_U105260792Medical Research Council MC_U137686857NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025741Wellcome Trust 082178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo use genetic variants as unconfounded proxies of C reactive protein concentration to study its causal role in coronary heart disease.

designMendelian randomisation meta-analysis of individual participant data from 47 epidemiological studies in 15 countries.

participants194 418 participants, including 46 557 patients with prevalent or incident coronary heart disease. Information was available on four CRP gene tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs3093077, rs1205, rs1130864, rs1800947), concentration of C reactive protein, and levels of other risk factors.

main outcome measuresRisk ratios for coronary heart disease associated with genetically raised C reactive protein versus risk ratios with equivalent differences in C reactive protein concentration itself, adjusted for conventional risk factors and variability in risk factor levels within individuals.

resultsCRP variants were each associated with up to 30% per allele difference in concentration of C reactive protein (P<10(-34)) and were unrelated to other risk factors. Risk ratios for coronary heart disease per additional copy of an allele associated with raised C reactive protein were 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.87 to 1.00) for rs3093077; 1.00 (0.98 to 1.02) for rs1205; 0.98 (0.96 to 1.00) for rs1130864; and 0.99 (0.94 to 1.03) for rs1800947. In a combined analysis, the risk ratio for coronary heart disease was 1.00 (0.90 to 1.13) per 1 SD higher genetically raised natural log (ln) concentration of C reactive protein. The genetic findings were discordant with the risk ratio observed for coronary heart disease of 1.33 (1.23 to 1.43) per 1 SD higher circulating ln concentration of C reactive protein in prospective studies (P=0.001 for difference).

conclusionHuman genetic data indicate that C reactive protein concentration itself is unlikely to be even a modest causal factor in coronary heart disease.

Indexed as

Coronary DiseaseC-Reactive ProteinFemaleGene FrequencyHumansMaleMendelian Randomization AnalysisMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProspective StudiesRisk FactorsC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID21325005
PMCPMC3039696
OpenAlexW1596038729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.