Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21324131›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2011

Bringing order to protein disorder through comparative genomics and genetic interactions.

Jeremy Bellay, Sangjo Han, Magali Michaut, Taehyung Kim, Michael Costanzo, Brenda J Andrews, Charles Boone, Gary D Bader, Chad L Myers, Philip M Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Systematic identification of conditionally folded intrinsically disordered regions by AlphaFold2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeremy BellayDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, 200 Union Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Sangjo Han
Magali Michaut
Taehyung Kim
Michael Costanzo
Brenda J Andrews
Charles Boone
Gary D Bader
Chad L Myers
Philip M Kim
University of Toronto · CAUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

TR&D 3 - Network Guided Machine LearningP41GM103504 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BADER, GARY D. · 2012 to 2024
$17.3M
Methods for large-scale analysis of chemical-genetic interactionsR01HG005084 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MYERS, CHAD L · 2010 to 2022
$2.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS 1R01HG005084-01A1NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005084NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrinsically disordered regions are widespread, especially in proteomes of higher eukaryotes. Recently, protein disorder has been associated with a wide variety of cellular processes and has been implicated in several human diseases. Despite its apparent functional importance, the sheer range of different roles played by protein disorder often makes its exact contribution difficult to interpret.

resultsWe attempt to better understand the different roles of disorder using a novel analysis that leverages both comparative genomics and genetic interactions. Strikingly, we find that disorder can be partitioned into three biologically distinct phenomena: regions where disorder is conserved but with quickly evolving amino acid sequences (flexible disorder); regions of conserved disorder with also highly conserved amino acid sequences (constrained disorder); and, lastly, non-conserved disorder. Flexible disorder bears many of the characteristics commonly attributed to disorder and is associated with signaling pathways and multi-functionality. Conversely, constrained disorder has markedly different functional attributes and is involved in RNA binding and protein chaperones. Finally, non-conserved disorder lacks clear functional hallmarks based on our analysis.

conclusionsOur new perspective on protein disorder clarifies a variety of previous results by putting them into a systematic framework. Moreover, the clear and distinct functional association of flexible and constrained disorder will allow for new approaches and more specific algorithms for disorder detection in a functional context. Finally, in flexible disordered regions, we demonstrate clear evolutionary selection of protein disorder with little selection on primary structure, which has important implications for sequence-based studies of protein structure and evolution.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceConserved SequenceDatabases, ProteinEscherichia coliEvolution, MolecularGenomicsHumansModels, StatisticalMolecular Sequence DataProteinsProtein Structure, TertiaryTranscriptomeProteins

Identifiers

PMID21324131
PMCPMC3188796
OpenAlexW2107040871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.