ArticleACS nano2011
Use of a high-throughput screening approach coupled with in vivo zebrafish embryo screening to develop hazard ranking for engineered nanomaterials.
Article in ACS nano, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
81 citing papers in PubMed, 319 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chemical screens for particle-induced macrophage death identifies kinase inhibitors of phagocytosis as targets for toxicity.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
- In vitro inflammation and toxicity assessment of pre- and post-incinerated organomodified nanoclays to macrophages using high-throughput screening approaches.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis between zebrafish and an automated live-cell assay to classify developmental neurotoxicant chemicals.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2023Article
- Nanoparticles-induced potential toxicity on human health: Applications, toxicity mechanisms, and evaluation models.MedComm · 2023Review
- Review
- High throughput embryonic zebrafish test with automated dechorionation to evaluate nanomaterial toxicity.PloS one · 2022Article
- Novel Hydrogel Scaffolds Based on Alginate, Gelatin, 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate, and Hydroxyapatite.Polymers · 2021Article
- The Use of Alternative Strategies for Enhanced Nanoparticle Delivery to Solid Tumors.Chemical reviews · 2021Review
- Nanoparticle-Based Activatable Probes for Bioimaging.Advanced biology · 2021Review
- Identifying diverse metal oxide nanomaterials with lethal effects on embryonic zebrafish using machine learning.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2021Article
- Understanding Nanoparticle Toxicity to Direct a Safe-by-Design Approach in Cancer Nanomedicine.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Genotoxicity of Nanomaterials: Advanced In Vitro Models and High Throughput Methods for Human Hazard Assessment-A Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Safety Considerations of Cancer Nanomedicine-A Key Step toward Translation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2020Review
- State-of-the-Art Technology of Model Organisms for Current Human Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- The Impact of Engineered Silver Nanomaterials on the Immune System.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Practices and Trends of Machine Learning Application in Nanotoxicology.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- ZnO nanocrystals derived from organometallic approach: Delineating the role of organic ligand shell on physicochemical properties and nano-specific toxicity.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Impact of humic acid on the fate and toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles inNanoscale advances · 2019Article
- Teratological and Behavioral Screening of the National Toxicology Program 91-Compound Library in Zebrafish (Danio rerio).Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2019Article
- Advanced physical techniques for gene delivery based on membrane perforation.Drug delivery · 2018Review
21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Because of concerns about the safety of a growing number of engineered nanomaterials (ENM), it is necessary to develop high-throughput screening and in silico data transformation tools that can speed up in vitro hazard ranking. Here, we report the use of a multiparametric, automated screening assay that incorporates sublethal and lethal cellular injury responses to perform high-throughput analysis of a batch of commercial metal/metal oxide nanoparticles (NP) with the inclusion of a quantum dot (QD1). The responses chosen for tracking cellular injury through automated epifluorescence microscopy included ROS production, intracellular calcium flux, mitochondrial depolarization, and plasma membrane permeability. The z-score transformed high volume data set was used to construct heat maps for in vitro hazard ranking as well as showing the similarity patterns of NPs and response parameters through the use of self-organizing maps (SOM). Among the materials analyzed, QD1 and nano-ZnO showed the most prominent lethality, while Pt, Ag, SiO2, Al2O3, and Au triggered sublethal effects but without cytotoxicity. In order to compare the in vitro with the in vivo response outcomes in zebrafish embryos, NPs were used to assess their impact on mortality rate, hatching rate, cardiac rate, and morphological defects. While QDs, ZnO, and Ag induced morphological abnormalities or interfered in embryo hatching, Pt and Ag exerted inhibitory effects on cardiac rate. Ag toxicity in zebrafish differed from the in vitro results, which is congruent with this material's designation as extremely dangerous in the environment. Interestingly, while toxicity in the initially selected QD formulation was due to a solvent (toluene), supplementary testing of additional QDs selections yielded in vitro hazard profiling that reflect the release of chalcogenides. In conclusion, the use of a high-throughput screening, in silico data handling and zebrafish testing may constitute a paradigm for rapid and integrated ENM toxicological screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.