Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21322058›Full record

ArticleGlia2011

Mouse schwann cells need both NRG1 and cyclic AMP to myelinate.

Peter Arthur-Farraj, Katharina Wanek, Janina Hantke, Catherine M Davis, Anuj Jayakar, David B Parkinson, Rhona Mirsky, Kristján R Jessen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Glia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. SARM1 detection in myelinating glia:Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter Arthur-FarrajDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Katharina Wanek
Janina Hantke
Catherine M Davis
Anuj Jayakar
David B Parkinson
Rhona Mirsky
Kristján R Jessen
University College London · GBGeorgetown University · USNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0601943Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetically modified mice have been a major source of information about the molecular control of Schwann-cell myelin formation, and the role of β-neuregulin 1 (NRG1) in this process in vivo. In vitro, on the other hand, Schwann cells from rats have been used in most analyses of the signaling pathways involved in myelination. To correlate more effectively in vivo and in vitro data, we used purified cultures of mouse Schwann cells in addition to rat Schwann cells to examine two important myelin-related signals, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), and NRG1 and to determine whether they interact to control myelin differentiation. We find that in mouse Schwann cells, neither cAMP nor NRG1, when used separately, induced markers of myelin differentiation. When combined, however, they induced strong protein expression of the myelin markers, Krox-20 and P(0) . Importantly, the level of cAMP signaling was crucial in switching NRG1 from a proliferative signal to a myelin differentiation signal. Also in cultured rat Schwann cells, NRG1 promoted cAMP-induced Krox-20 and P(0) expression. Finally, we found that cAMP/NRG1-induced Schwann-cell differentiation required the activity of the cAMP response element binding family of transcription factors in both mouse and rat cells. These observations reconcile observations in vivo and on neuron-Schwann-cell cultures with studies on purified Schwann cells. They demonstrate unambiguously the promyelin effects of NRG1 in purified cells, and they show that the cAMP pathway determines whether NRG1 drives proliferation or induces myelin differentiation.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsBlotting, WesternCells, CulturedCyclic AMPImmunohistochemistryIn Situ HybridizationMiceMyelin P0 ProteinMyelin SheathNeuregulin-1RatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSchwann CellsSciatic NerveCyclic AMPMyelin P0 ProteinNeuregulin-1Nrg1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID21322058
PMCPMC5722196
OpenAlexW2138046729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.