Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21321976›Full record

ArticleThe Prostate2011

Development of a brain metastatic canine prostate cancer cell line.

Nanda K Thudi, Sherry T Shu, Chelsea K Martin, Lisa G Lanigan, Murali V P Nadella, Adrie Van Bokhoven, Jillian L Werbeck, Jessica K Simmons, Sridhar Murahari, William C Kisseberth and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Prostate, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparative pathology of dog and human prostate cancer.Veterinary medicine and science · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Animal Models of Bone Metastasis.Veterinary pathology · 2015
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nanda K ThudiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Sherry T Shu
Chelsea K Martin
Lisa G Lanigan
Murali V P Nadella
Adrie Van Bokhoven
Jillian L Werbeck
Jessica K Simmons
Sridhar Murahari
William C Kisseberth
Matthew Breen
Christina Williams
Ching-Shih Chen
Laurie K McCauley
Evan T Keller
Thomas J Rosol
The Ohio State University · USNorth Carolina State University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Colorado Health · US

Funding

Tumor microvesicle-mediated modulation of the bone microenvironmentP01CA093900 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PIENTA, KENNETH J. · 2004 to 2024
$29.6M
NCI NIH HHS 2P01 CA93900NCI NIH HHS P01 CA093900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer in men has a high mortality and morbidity due to metastatic disease. The pathobiology of prostate cancer metastasis is not well understood and cell lines and animal models that recapitulate the complex nature of the disease are needed. Therefore, the goal of the study was to establish and characterize a new prostate cancer line derived from a dog with spontaneous prostate cancer.

methodsA new cell line (Leo) was derived from a dog with spontaneous prostate cancer. Immunohistochemistry and PCR were used to characterize the primary prostate cancer and xenografts in nude mice. Subcutaneous tumor growth and metastases in nude mice were evaluated by bioluminescent imaging, radiography and histopathology. In vitro chemosensitivity of Leo cells to therapeutic agents was measured.

resultsLeo cells expressed the secretory epithelial cytokeratins (CK)8, 18, and ductal cell marker, CK7. The cell line grew in vitro (over 75 passages) and was tumorigenic in the subcutis of nude mice. Following intracardiac injection, Leo cells metastasized to the brain, spinal cord, bone, and adrenal gland. The incidence of metastases was greatest to the central nervous system (80%) with a lower incidence to bone (20%) and the adrenal glands (16%). In vitro chemosensitivity assays demonstrated that Leo cells were sensitive to Velcade and an HDAC-42 inhibitor with IC(50) concentrations of 1.9 nm and 0.95 µm, respectively.

conclusionThe new prostate cancer cell line (Leo) will be a valuable model to investigate the mechanisms of the brain and bone metastases.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorAdrenal Gland NeoplasmsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBone NeoplasmsBoronic AcidsBortezomibBrain NeoplasmsCarcinogenicity TestsCarcinomaCell DivisionDogsImmunohistochemistryIncidenceInjections, SubcutaneousKeratin-18Antineoplastic AgentsBoronic AcidsBortezomibHDAC-42Keratin-18Keratin-7Keratin-8Parathyroid Hormone-Related ProteinPhenylbutyratesPyrazines

Identifiers

PMID21321976
PMCPMC3139788
OpenAlexW2046231009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.