Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21321746›Full record

ArticleIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2011

A perspective on vascular disrupting agents that interact with tubulin: preclinical tumor imaging and biological assessment.

Ralph P Mason, Dawen Zhao, Li Liu, Mary Lynn Trawick, Kevin G Pinney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ralph P MasonDepartment of Radiology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas 75390-9058, USA.
Dawen Zhao
Li Liu
Mary Lynn Trawick
Kevin G Pinney
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USBaylor University · USIn-Q-Tel · US

Funding

UT Southwestern Medical Center Simmons Comprehensive Cancer CenterP30CA142543 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Sandi Leigh Pruitt · 2010 to 2026
$53.7M
YTTRIUM HYPERPOLARIZATIONP41RR002584 · NCRR · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MASON, RALPH P. · 1985 to 2011
$14.3M
UT Southwestern Small Animal Imaging ResourceU24CA126608 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MASON, RALPH P., SHERRY, DEAN · 2007 to 2011
$2.3M
Hypoxia and Radiotherapy: Evaluation and Mitigation in TumorsR01CA139043 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MASON, RALPH P. · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Chemotherapeutic Agents with Enhanced Selectivity for the Tumor MicroenvironmentR01CA140674 · NCI · BAYLOR UNIVERSITY · PI PINNEY, KEVIN G., TRAWICK, MARY LYNN · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
Small Animal Bioluminescence and Fluorescence Imaging System (with 3D capability)S10RR024757 · NCRR · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MASON, RALPH P. · 2007 to 2007
$335k
Small Animal Ultrasound System (VisualSonics Vevo 770)S10RR025648 · NCRR · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MASON, RALPH P. · 2009 to 2009
$296k
NCI NIH HHS 1R01 CA140674-01A1NCI NIH HHS 1U24 CA126608NCI NIH HHS P30 CA142543NCI NIH HHS R01 CA139043NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140674NCI NIH HHS U24 CA126608NCRR NIH HHS 1S10RR024757-01NCRR NIH HHS 1S10RR025648-01NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR002584NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR02584NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR024757NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR025648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor microenvironment provides a rich source of potential targets for selective therapeutic intervention with properly designed anticancer agents. Significant physiological differences exist between the microvessels that nourish tumors and those that supply healthy tissue. Selective drug-mediated damage of these tortuous and chaotic microvessels starves a tumor of necessary nutrients and oxygen and eventually leads to massive tumor necrosis. Vascular targeting strategies in oncology are divided into two separate groups: angiogenesis inhibiting agents (AIAs) and vascular disrupting agents (VDAs). The mechanisms of action between these two classes of compounds are profoundly distinct. The AIAs inhibit the actual formation of new vessels, while the VDAs damage and/or destroy existing tumor vasculature. One subset of small-molecule VDAs functions by inhibiting the assembly of tubulin into microtubules, thus causing morphology changes to the endothelial cells lining the tumor vasculature, triggered by a cascade of cell signaling events. Ultimately this results in catastrophic damage to the vessels feeding the tumor. The rapid emergence and subsequent development of the VDA field over the past decade has led to the establishment of a synergistic combination of preclinical state-of-the-art tumor imaging and biological evaluation strategies that are often indicative of future clinical efficacy for a given VDA. This review focuses on an integration of the appropriate biochemical and biological tools necessary to assess (preclinically) new small-molecule, tubulin active VDAs for their potential to be clinically effective anticancer agents.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisCapillary PermeabilityCell AdhesionCell ProliferationCells, CulturedDiagnostic ImagingDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEndothelial CellsEndothelium, VascularHumansHypoxiaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceMicrovesselsTubulinTubulin Modulators

Identifiers

PMID21321746
PMCPMC3071431
OpenAlexW2050344391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.