Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21321478›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences2011

Ivermectin, 'wonder drug' from Japan: the human use perspective.

Andy Crump, Satoshi Ōmura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Interactions at theMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Review
  9. Bioprospecting Indoor Bacteria Producing Bioactive Metabolites.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Deep phenotypic profiling uncovers cryptic effects of antifilarial drugs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andy CrumpThe Kitasato Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi Ōmura

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovered in the late-1970s, the pioneering drug ivermectin, a dihydro derivative of avermectin--originating solely from a single microorganism isolated at the Kitasato Institute, Tokyo, Japan from Japanese soil--has had an immeasurably beneficial impact in improving the lives and welfare of billions of people throughout the world. Originally introduced as a veterinary drug, it kills a wide range of internal and external parasites in commercial livestock and companion animals. It was quickly discovered to be ideal in combating two of the world's most devastating and disfiguring diseases which have plagued the world's poor throughout the tropics for centuries. It is now being used free-of-charge as the sole tool in campaigns to eliminate both diseases globally. It has also been used to successfully overcome several other human diseases and new uses for it are continually being found. This paper looks in depth at the events surrounding ivermectin's passage from being a huge success in Animal Health into its widespread use in humans, a development which has led many to describe it as a "wonder" drug.

Indexed as

Antiparasitic AgentsDrug ResistanceHumansIvermectinJapanOnchocerciasisTreatment OutcomeAntiparasitic AgentsIvermectin

Identifiers

PMID21321478
PMCPMC3043740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.