Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21321134›Full record

ArticleGenetics2011

The 19 genomes of Drosophila: a BAC library resource for genus-wide and genome-scale comparative evolutionary research.

Xiang Song, Jose Luis Goicoechea, Jetty S S Ammiraju, Meizhong Luo, Ruifeng He, Jinke Lin, So-Jeong Lee, Nicholas Sisneros, Tom Watts, David A Kudrna and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The role ofScience advances · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. TheGenetics · 2018
    Article
  7. BioMed research international · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Genetic and Transgenic Reagents forG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genome engineering: Drosophila melanogaster and beyond.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Xiang SongArizona Genomics Institute and BIO5 Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA.
Jose Luis Goicoechea
Jetty S S Ammiraju
Meizhong Luo
Ruifeng He
Jinke Lin
So-Jeong Lee
Nicholas Sisneros
Tom Watts
David A Kudrna
Wolfgang Golser
Elizabeth Ashley
Kristi Collura
Michele Braidotti
Yeisoo Yu
Luciano M Matzkin
Bryant F McAllister
Therese Ann Markow
Rod A Wing

Funding

BAC Library Production /Distribuion for 'Healthy peopleU01HG002525 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI WING, ROD A · 2002 to 2006
$3.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG002525NHGRI NIH HHS U1HG02525A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genus Drosophila has been the subject of intense comparative phylogenomics characterization to provide insights into genome evolution under diverse biological and ecological contexts and to functionally annotate the Drosophila melanogaster genome, a model system for animal and insect genetics. Recent sequencing of 11 additional Drosophila species from various divergence points of the genus is a first step in this direction. However, to fully reap the benefits of this resource, the Drosophila community is faced with two critical needs: i.e., the expansion of genomic resources from a much broader range of phylogenetic diversity and the development of additional resources to aid in finishing the existing draft genomes. To address these needs, we report the first synthesis of a comprehensive set of bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) resources for 19 Drosophila species from all three subgenera. Ten libraries were derived from the exact source used to generate 10 of the 12 draft genomes, while the rest were generated from a strategically selected set of species on the basis of salient ecological and life history features and their phylogenetic positions. The majority of the new species have at least one sequenced reference genome for immediate comparative benefit. This 19-BAC library set was rigorously characterized and shown to have large insert sizes (125-168 kb), low nonrecombinant clone content (0.3-5.3%), and deep coverage (9.1-42.9×). Further, we demonstrated the utility of this BAC resource for generating physical maps of targeted loci, refining draft sequence assemblies and identifying potential genomic rearrangements across the phylogeny.

Indexed as

Genome, InsectGenomic LibraryAnimalsBiological EvolutionChromosome MappingChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialChromosomes, InsectDrosophila melanogasterGenes, InsectPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID21321134
PMCPMC3070512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.