ArticleGenetics2011
The 19 genomes of Drosophila: a BAC library resource for genus-wide and genome-scale comparative evolutionary research.
Article in Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role ofScience advances · 2024Article
- Genomic resources of broomcorn millet: demonstration and application of a high-throughput BAC mapping pipeline.BMC genomic data · 2021Article
- Review
- Evolution of Reproductive Behavior.Genetics · 2020Review
- Article
- TheGenetics · 2018Article
- Review
- Genomic changes following the reversal of a Y chromosome to an autosome in Drosophila pseudoobscura.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2017Article
- Genetic and Transgenic Reagents forG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
- Immune-directed support of rich microbial communities in the gut has ancient roots.Developmental and comparative immunology · 2014Review
- Genomic resources for gene discovery, functional genome annotation, and evolutionary studies of maize and its close relatives.Genetics · 2013Article
- Dissecting sources of quantitative gene expression pattern divergence between Drosophila species.Molecular systems biology · 2012Article
- A pair of new BAC and BIBAC vectors that facilitate BAC/BIBAC library construction and intact large genomic DNA insert exchange.Plant methods · 2011Article
- Genomic sequence around butterfly wing development genes: annotation and comparative analysis.PloS one · 2011Article
- Genome engineering: Drosophila melanogaster and beyond.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The genus Drosophila has been the subject of intense comparative phylogenomics characterization to provide insights into genome evolution under diverse biological and ecological contexts and to functionally annotate the Drosophila melanogaster genome, a model system for animal and insect genetics. Recent sequencing of 11 additional Drosophila species from various divergence points of the genus is a first step in this direction. However, to fully reap the benefits of this resource, the Drosophila community is faced with two critical needs: i.e., the expansion of genomic resources from a much broader range of phylogenetic diversity and the development of additional resources to aid in finishing the existing draft genomes. To address these needs, we report the first synthesis of a comprehensive set of bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) resources for 19 Drosophila species from all three subgenera. Ten libraries were derived from the exact source used to generate 10 of the 12 draft genomes, while the rest were generated from a strategically selected set of species on the basis of salient ecological and life history features and their phylogenetic positions. The majority of the new species have at least one sequenced reference genome for immediate comparative benefit. This 19-BAC library set was rigorously characterized and shown to have large insert sizes (125-168 kb), low nonrecombinant clone content (0.3-5.3%), and deep coverage (9.1-42.9×). Further, we demonstrated the utility of this BAC resource for generating physical maps of targeted loci, refining draft sequence assemblies and identifying potential genomic rearrangements across the phylogeny.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.