ArticleJournal of molecular biology2011
The reverse transcriptase encoded by the non-LTR retrotransposon R2 is as error-prone as that encoded by HIV-1.
Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional analyses identify the L1 ORF2p Cryptic domain as a hub for intramolecular interfaces required for retrotransposition.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing Methods to Determine the Accuracy of Retroviral Reverse Transcriptases: Advantages and Limitations.Viruses · 2025Review
- Discrete measurements of RNA polymerase and reverse transcriptase fidelity reveal evolutionary tuning.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in Double-Strand Break-Free Kilobase-Scale Genome Editing Technologies.Biochemistry · 2023Review
- Characterization and Evolution of Germ1, an Element that Undergoes Diminution in Lampreys (Cyclostomata: Petromyzontidae).Journal of molecular evolution · 2019Article
- Involvement of Conserved Amino Acids in the C-Terminal Region of LINE-1 ORF2p in Retrotransposition.Genetics · 2017Article
- Identification and characterisation of Short Interspersed Nuclear Elements in the olive tree (Olea europaea L.) genome.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2017Article
- Evolutionary Insights into RNA trans-Splicing in Vertebrates.Genome biology and evolution · 2016Review
- Integration, Regulation, and Long-Term Stability of R2 Retrotransposons.Microbiology spectrum · 2015Review
- Virus and host factors affecting the clinical outcome of bluetongue virus infection.Journal of virology · 2014Article
- Identification of RNA binding motifs in the R2 retrotransposon-encoded reverse transcriptase.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Preferential occupancy of R2 retroelements on the B chromosomes of the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans.PloS one · 2014Article
- The specificity and flexibility of l1 reverse transcription priming at imperfect T-tracts.PLoS genetics · 2013Article
- Non-LTR R2 element evolutionary patterns: phylogenetic incongruences, rapid radiation and the maintenance of multiple lineages.PloS one · 2013Article
- Viral quasispecies evolution.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Reverse transcriptases (RTs) encoded by a wide range of mobile retroelements have had a major impact on the structure and function of genomes. Among the most abundant elements in eukaryotes are the non long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons. Here we compare the dNTP concentration requirements and error rates of the RT encoded by the non-LTR retrotransposon R2 of Bombyx mori with the well-characterized RTs of retroviruses. Surprisingly, R2 was found to have properties more similar to those of lentiviral RTs, such as human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), than to those of oncoretroviral RTs, such as murine leukemia virus. Like HIV-1 RT, R2 RT was able to synthesize DNA at low dNTP concentrations, suggesting that R2 is able to retrotranspose in nondividing cells. R2 RT also showed levels of misincorporation in biased dNTP pools and replication error rates in M13 lacZα forward mutation assays, similar to HIV-1 RT. Most of the R2 base substitutions in the forward mutation assay were caused by the misincorporation of dTMP. Analogous to HIV-1, the high error rate of R2 RT appears to be a result of its ability to extend mismatches once generated. We suggest that the low fidelity of R2 RT is a by-product of the flexibility of its active site/dNTP binding pocket required for the target-primed reverse transcription reaction used by R2 for retrotransposition. Finally, we discuss that in spite of the high R2 RT error rate, the long-term nucleotide substitution rate for R2 is not significantly above that associated with cellular DNA replication, based on the frequency of R2 retrotranspositions determined in natural populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.