Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21320424›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2011

A matter of life or death: modeling DNA damage and repair in bacteria.

Jens Karschau, Camila de Almeida, Morgiane C Richard, Samantha Miller, Ian R Booth, Celso Grebogi, Alessandro P S de Moura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Host methylglyoxal activates theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Single-molecule DNA repair in live bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Optimality in DNA repair.Journal of theoretical biology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jens KarschauInstitute of Complex Systems and Mathematical Biology, SUPA, King's College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Camila de Almeida
Morgiane C Richard
Samantha Miller
Ian R Booth
Celso Grebogi
Alessandro P S de Moura

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F003455/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F00513X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage is a hazard all cells must face, and evolution has created a number of mechanisms to repair damaged bases in the chromosome. Paradoxically, many of these repair mechanisms can create double-strand breaks in the DNA molecule which are fatal to the cell. This indicates that the connection between DNA repair and death is far from straightforward, and suggests that the repair mechanisms can be a double-edged sword. In this report, we formulate a mathematical model of the dynamics of DNA damage and repair, and we obtain analytical expressions for the death rate. We predict a counterintuitive relationship between survival and repair. We can discriminate between two phases: below a critical threshold in the number of repair enzymes, the half-life decreases with the number of repair enzymes, but becomes independent of the number of repair enzymes above the threshold. We are able to predict quantitatively the dependence of the death rate on the damage rate and other relevant parameters. We verify our analytical results by simulating the stochastic dynamics of DNA damage and repair. Finally, we also perform an experiment with Escherichia coli cells to test one of the predictions of our model.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairMicrobial ViabilityModels, BiologicalComputer SimulationEscherichia coliPyruvaldehydeStochastic ProcessesPyruvaldehyde

Identifiers

PMID21320424
PMCPMC3037714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.