Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21320338›Full record

Trial reportTrials2011

Homeopathy for depression--DEP-HOM: study protocol for a randomized, partially double-blind, placebo controlled, four armed study.

Ubiratan C Adler, Stephanie Krüger, Michael Teut, Rainer Lüdtke, Iris Bartsch, Lena Schützler, Friedericke Melcher, Stefan N Willich, Klaus Linde, Claudia M Witt

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01178255 phase3terminatednot on this map

Homeopathy for Depression: a Randomized, Partially Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Four Armed Study DEP-HOM

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharite University, Berlin, GermanyRan2010 to 2011Enrolled44ConditionsMajor DepressionArmshomeopathic q-potencies, Placebo, homeopathic case history taking type I, homeopathic case history type II
NCT01635218 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Treatment for Moderate to Severe Depression in Peri- and Postmenopausal Women: a Randomized Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Study Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Juarez de MexicoRan2012 to 2014Enrolled133ConditionsModerate Depression, Menopausal and Postmenopausal DisordersArmsIndividualized homeopathic treatment, Fluoxetine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ubiratan C AdlerInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics; Charité University Medical Center; D-10098 Berlin, Germany. ubiratan.adler@charite.de
Stephanie Krüger
Michael Teut
Rainer Lüdtke
Iris Bartsch
Lena Schützler
Friedericke Melcher
Stefan N Willich
Klaus Linde
Claudia M Witt
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKarl und Veronica Carstens-Stiftung · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHomeopathy is often sought by patients with depression. In classical homeopathy, the treatment consists of two main elements: the case history and the prescription of an individually selected homeopathic remedy. Previous data suggest that individualized homeopathic Q-potencies were not inferior to the antidepressant fluoxetine in a sample of patients with moderate to severe depression. However, the question remains whether individualized homeopathic Q-potencies and/or the type of the homeopathic case history have a specific therapeutical effect in acute depression as this has not yet been investigated. The study aims to assess the two components of individualized homeopathic treatment for acute depression, i.e., to investigate the specific effect of individualized Q-potencies versus placebo and to investigate the effect of different approaches to the homeopathic case history. METHODS/

designA randomized, partially double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-armed trial using a 2 x 2 factorial design with a six-week study duration per patient will be performed. 228 patients diagnosed with major depression (moderate episode) by a psychiatrist will be included. The primary endpoint is the total score on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale after six weeks. Secondary end points are: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale total score after two and four weeks; response and remission rates, Beck Depression inventory total score, quality of life and safety at two, four and six weeks. Statistical analyses will be by intention-to-treat. The main endpoint will be analysed by a two-factorial analysis of covariance. Within this model generalized estimation equations will be used to estimate differences between verum and placebo, and between both types of case history. DISCUSSION: For the first time this study evaluates both the specific effect of homeopathic medicines and of a homeopathic case taking in patients with depression. It is an attempt to deal with the challenges of homeopathic research and the results might be useful information in the current discussion about the evidence on homeopathy

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01178255.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedDepressive DisorderDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHomeopathyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlacebosResearch DesignSample SizeYoung AdultPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID21320338
PMCPMC3045905
OpenAlexW2123006641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.