Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21319991›Full record

ArticleOmics : a journal of integrative biology2011

Biomarkers in the age of omics: time for a systems biology approach.

Mones S Abu-Asab, Mohamed Chaouchi, Salvatore Alesci, Susana Galli, Majid Laassri, Amrita K Cheema, Fouad Atouf, John VanMeter, Hakima Amri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Omics : a journal of integrative biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Climate change and cetacean health: impacts and future directions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Precision medicine: Concept and tools.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2021
    Review
  9. Metabolomic Biomarkers in Anxiety Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. PhyloOncology: Understanding cancer through phylogenetic analysis.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Genomics of Colorectal Cancer in African Americans.Next generation, sequencing & applications · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mones S Abu-AsabLaboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Mohamed Chaouchi
Salvatore Alesci
Susana Galli
Majid Laassri
Amrita K Cheema
Fouad Atouf
John VanMeter
Hakima Amri

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limitations to biomarker discovery are not only technical or bioinformatic but conceptual as well. In our attempt to offer a solution, we are highlighting three issues that we think are limiting progress in biomarkers discovery. First, the confusion stemming from the imposition of a pathology-type immunohistochemical marker (IHCM) concept on omics data without fully understanding the characteristics and limitations of IHCMs as applied in clinical pathology. Second, the lack of serious consideration for the scope of disease heterogeneity. Third, the refusal of the biomedical community to borrow from other biological disciplines their well established methods for dealing with heterogeneity. Therefore, real progress in biomarker discovery will be attained when we recognize that an omics biomarker cannot be assigned and validated without a priori data modeling and subtyping of the disease itself to reveal the extent of its heterogeneity, and its omics' clonal aberrations (drivers) underlying its subtypes and pathways' diversity. To further support our viewpoints, we are contributing a novel a systems biology method such as parsimony phylogenetic approach for disease modeling prior to biomarker circumscription. As an analytical approach that has been successfully used for a half of a century in other biological disciplines, parsimony phylogenetics simultaneously achieves several objectives: it provides disease modeling in a hierarchical phylogenetic classification, identifies biomarkers as the shared derived expressions or mutations--synapomorphies, constructs the omics profiles of specimens based on the most parsimonious arrangement of their heterogeneous data, and permits network profiling of affected signaling pathways as the biosignature of disease classes.

Indexed as

Systems BiologyBiomarkersGenomicsHumansImmunohistochemistryProteomicsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID21319991
PMCPMC3060038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.