Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21319808›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2011

High-throughput selection, enumeration, electrokinetic manipulation, and molecular profiling of low-abundance circulating tumor cells using a microfluidic system.

Udara Dharmasiri, Samuel K Njoroge, Małgorzata A Witek, Morayo G Adebiyi, Joyce W Kamande, Mateusz L Hupert, Francis Barany, Steven A Soper

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Udara DharmasiriCenter for Bio-Modular Multi-Scale Systems, Louisiana State University, 8000 GSRI Road, Building 3100, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70820-7403, United States.
Samuel K Njoroge
Małgorzata A Witek
Morayo G Adebiyi
Joyce W Kamande
Mateusz L Hupert
Francis Barany
Steven A Soper
Louisiana State University · USCornell University · US

Funding

NEW METHODS FOR CANCER DETECTIONP01CA065930 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI BARANY, FRANCIS · 1997 to 2007
$14.1M
Trangenic Mouse Breeding CoreP01HL114457 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI BLACKBURN, MICHAEL R · 2013 to 2017
$10.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA065930NCI NIH HHS R33-CA09924601NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL114457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A circulating tumor cell (CTC) selection microfluidic device was integrated to an electrokinetic enrichment device for preconcentrating CTCs directly from whole blood to allow for the detection of mutations contained within the genomic DNA of the CTCs. Molecular profiling of CTCs can provide important clinical information that cannot be garnered simply by enumerating the selected CTCs. We evaluated our approach using SW620 and HT29 cells (colorectal cancer cell lines) seeded into whole blood as a model system. Because SW620 and HT29 cells overexpress the integral membrane protein EpCAM, they could be immunospecifically selected using a microfluidic device containing anti-EpCAM antibodies immobilized to the walls of a selection bed. The microfluidic device was operated at an optimized flow rate of 2 mm s(-1), which allowed for the ability to process 1 mL of whole blood in <40 min. The selected CTCs were then enzymatically released from the antibody selection surface and hydrodynamically transported through a pair of Pt electrodes for conductivity-based enumeration. The efficiency of CTC selection was found to be 96% ± 4%. Following enumeration, the CTCs were hydrodynamically transported at a flow rate of 1 μL min(-1) to an on-chip electromanipulation unit, where they were electrophoretically withdrawn from the bulk hydrodynamic flow and directed into a receiving reservoir. Using an electric field of 100 V cm(-1), the negatively charged CTCs were enriched into an anodic receiving reservoir to a final volume of 2 μL, providing an enrichment factor of 500. The collected CTCs could then be searched for point mutations using a PCR/LDR/capillary electrophoresis assay. The DNA extracted from the CTCs was subjected to a primary polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the amplicons used for a ligase detection reaction (LDR) to probe for KRAS oncogenic point mutations. Point mutations in codon 12 of the KRAS gene were successfully detected in the SW620 CTCs for samples containing <10 CTCs in 1 mL of whole blood. However, the HT29 cells did not contain these mutations, consistent with their known genotype.

Indexed as

ElectricityMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesCell CountCell SeparationElectric ConductivityElectrophoresis, CapillaryHT29 CellsHumansHydrodynamicsLigasesNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPolymerase Chain ReactionSurface PropertiesLigases

Identifiers

PMID21319808
PMCPMC4380022
OpenAlexW2000649281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.