ArticleClinical cardiology2011
Prevalence and spectrum of coronary artery anomalies in patients with an isolated congenital left ventricular aneurysm or diverticulum.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Report: Neonatal heart failure: a rare presentation of congenital left ventricular aneurysm.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Left ventricular inferior wall congenital diverticula in athletes: a case series and review of the literature.European heart journal. Case reports · 2024Article
- Congenital left ventricular aneurysms and diverticula: an entity in search of an identity.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2017Review
- Coexistence of congenital left ventricular aneurysm and prominent left ventricular trabeculation in a patient with LDB3 mutation: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2017Article
- Coronary anomaly with a left ventricular accessory chamber: Is it left ventricular aneurysm or diverticulum?Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) and diverticulum (LVD) are rare cardiac anomalies and frequently associated with other cardiac anomalies. The objective of our study was to investigate the prevalence and the spectrum of coronary anomalies in such patients. HYPOTHESIS: The incidence of coronary anomalies is increased in patients with LVA or LVD.
methodsWe assessed 117 patients with isolated LVA or LVD for the prevalence of coronary anomalies and compared the findings with an age- and sex-matched control group (n = 117) without the diagnosis of LVA or LVD.
resultsCoronary anomalies were present in 58.1% of the study population (68 of 117). The median age of affected patients was 64 years, and 45 (38.5%) were male. Coronary anomalies were more prevalent in patients with LVA or LVD (58.1% vs 6.8%, P < 0.001), male patients (89% vs 57%, P = 0.0002), and in patients with nonapical location of LVA or LVD (24% vs 45%, P = 0.02) compared with control, whereas age and type (LVA vs LVD) had no influence (57% vs 57.6%, P = 0.4; and 58.8% vs 57.6%, P = 0.87, respectively). The number of adverse cardiac events was similar in both groups during a 4.2-year follow-up period (29% vs 19%, P = 0.09). None of the patients in our series had major coronary anomalies with potential lethal consequences.
conclusionsThis large single-center study suggests that the prevalence of abnormal coronary-artery anatomy in patients with isolated LVA or LVD is as high as 58.1%. However, we did not identify major coronary anomalies with potential lethal consequences, and the clinical course during follow-up was not influenced by the presence or absence of coronary anomalies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.