Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21318644›Full record

ReviewJournal of autism and developmental disorders2011

Progress in understanding autism: 2007-2010.

Michael L Rutter

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genetic Advances in Autism.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Autism biomarkers: challenges, pitfalls and possibilities.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2015
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The autism puzzle: challenging a mechanistic model on conceptual and historical grounds.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2013
    Article
  12. Priorities for autism spectrum disorder risk communication and ethics.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Changing concepts and findings on autism.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2013
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael L RutterMRC Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, PO Box 80, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK. camilla.azis@kcl.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific progress is discussed in relation to clinical issues; genetic issues; environmental issues; and the state of play on psychological treatments. It is concluded that substantial gains in knowledge have been achieved during the last 3 years, and there have been some unexpected findings, but major puzzles remain. We should be hopeful of ever greater gains in the years ahead, but both prevention and cure remain elusive.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.