Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21318637›Full record

Trial reportLung2011

Pulmonary function and abdominal and thoracic kinematic changes following aerobic and inspiratory resistive diaphragmatic breathing training in asthmatics.

Brandon S Shaw, Ina Shaw

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lung, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04636658 (Effects of Resistive Diaphragmatic Training on Pulmonary Functions in Patients With Chronic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04636658 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Resistive Diaphragmatic Training on Pulmonary Functions in Patients With Chronic Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2020 to 2020Enrolled20ConditionsStroke (CVA) or TIAArmsIncentive spirometer training, diaphragmatic resistance exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pulmonary rehabilitation versus usual care for adults with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review of the Effect of Physical Activity on Asthma Outcomes.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Inspiratory muscle training for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Clinical standards for the assessment, management and rehabilitation of post-TB lung disease.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon S ShawDepartment of Sport, Rehabilitation and Dental Sciences, Tshwane University of Technology, Private Bag X680, Pretoria, Gauteng 0001, Republic of South Africa. shawbs@tut.ac.za
Ina Shaw
Tshwane University of Technology · ZAVaal University of Technology · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of 8 weeks, three times weekly, of aerobic exercise (AE), diaphragmatic inspiratory resistive breathing (DR), and aerobic exercise combined with diaphragmatic inspiratory resistive breathing (CE) on pulmonary function and abdominal and thoracic dimensions and kinematics in asthmatics. Eighty-eight inactive, moderate-persistent asthmatics were matched and randomly assigned to AE, DR, CE, or nonexercise control (NE) groups (n = 22 each). AE subjects walked and/or jogged at 60% of age-predicted maximum heart rate. DR subjects performed diaphragmatic breathing combined with inspiratory resistive breathing at varying inspiration, expiration ratios. CE subjects utilized a combination of the AE and DR programs. AE, DR, and CE significantly (p ≤ 0.05) improved chest dimensions and kinematics during inspiration at the height of the second intercostal space, during inspiration and expiration at the height of the xiphoid process, and during inspiration and expiration at the height of the midpoint between the xiphoid process and umbilicus. All exercise interventions significantly improved FVC, FEV(1), PEF, and IVC, while MVV improved following AE and CE. However, CE proved superior to AE at improving FVC (p = 0.001), FEV(1) (p = 0.001), and IVC (p = 0.009). There were no significant changes (p > 0.05) in any of the measured parameters in the NE group. CE produces adaptations greater than those for single-mode training in moderate-persistent asthmatics. The results suggest synergy rather than interference between aerobic exercise and diaphragmatic inspiratory resistive breathing and that this mode of training might be useful as an adjunct therapy in asthmatic patients.

Indexed as

Breathing ExercisesAbdomenAdolescentAdultAsthmaBiomechanical PhenomenaDiaphragmExerciseFemaleHumansInhalationLungMalePhysical EnduranceRespiratory Function TestsRespiratory Physiological Phenomena

Identifiers

PMID21318637
OpenAlexW2084808892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.