ArticleWorld journal of surgery2011
Evaluation of current devices in single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a preliminary experience in 32 consecutive cases.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Single incision laparoscopy versus conventional multiport laparoscopy for colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2023Pooled it
- Single-incision laparoscopic versus traditional multiport laparoscopic colorectal surgery--a cumulative meta-analysis and systematic review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2013Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials only exploring the role of single incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for colorectal resections.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018Article
- Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Current status and implementation of the latest technological innovations.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- Resident training in single-incision laparoscopic colectomy.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2015Article
- Review of single incision laparoscopic surgery in colorectal surgery.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Review
- New trends in colorectal surgery: single port and natural orifice techniques.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: state of art.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Three ports laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: a step on refining of reduced port surgery.ISRN surgery · 2014Article
- Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: outcomes from 224 colonic resections performed at a single center using SILS.Surgical endoscopy · 2013Article
- Conventional laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case cohort comparison of short-term outcomes in 144 consecutive cases.Surgical endoscopy · 2013Article
- Single-incision (with multi-input single-port) laparoscopic colorectal procedures: Early results.Ulusal cerrahi dergisi · 2013Article
- Article
- Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: technical aspects and short-term results.Updates in surgery · 2012Article
- Single-incision laparoscopic surgeries for colorectal diseases: early experiences of a novel surgical method.Minimally invasive surgery · 2012Article
- Evaluation of current devices in single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery.World journal of surgery · 2011Article
- SILS sigmoidectomy versus multiport laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSingle-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery (SILS) suggests a promising alternative to conventional laparoscopic surgery. In this report we describe our initial experience with SILS for both right hemicolectomies and anterior resections.
methodsBetween June 2009 and May 2010, SILS was performed for 32 consecutive cases with benign and malignant pathology. Demographic data, intraoperative parameters, postoperative data, and pathologic data were assessed.
resultsTwenty-one SILS right hemicolectomies, ten ARs, and one abdominal perineal resection (APR) were performed. For SILS right hemicolectomies, one case required full "conversion" to a laparoscopic procedure. The median operating time was 85 min (range 45-150 min) and the median wound length was 5.0 cm (range 3.0-10.0 cm). Median number of lymph nodes extracted in malignant cases was 17(range 10-30) and the overall median length of stay was 6 days (range 5-11). For left-sided lesions, ten cases of ARs (7 high ARs, 2 low ARs, 1 ultralow AR) and one APR were performed. Three cases were completed successfully via the SILS procedure, four cases required one additional port, and four cases required full "conversion" to a laparoscopic procedure. The median operating time was 120 min (range 65-235 min) and the median wound length was 5.0 cm (range 3.0-7.0 cm). Overall median length of stay was also 6 days (range 5-21). There was one case of anastomotic leak and one case of postoperative bleeding.
conclusionIn our experience, SILS for right hemicolectomies is safe and effective with reproducible oncologic results. SILS AR, however, requires greater modifications in current devices and techniques. SILS AR can be performed for both malignant and benign diseases but additional ports may be necessary for the safe completion of the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21318430What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.