ReviewSeminars in immunopathology2011
Advances of genomic science and systems biology in renal transplantation: a review.
Review in Seminars in immunopathology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- High Throughput Proteomic Exploration of Hypothermic Preservation Reveals Active Processes within the Cell Associated with Cold Ischemia Kinetic.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Peripheral Blood RNA Sequencing Unravels a Differential Signature of Coding and Noncoding Genes by Types of Kidney Allograft Rejection.Kidney international reports · 2020Article
- Identifying 4 Novel lncRNAs as Potential Biomarkers for Acute Rejection and Graft Loss of Renal Allograft.Journal of immunology research · 2020Article
- K121Q polymorphism in the Ectonucleotide Pyrophosphatase/Phosphodiesterase 1 gene is associated with acute kidney rejection.PloS one · 2019Article
- Biomarkers and Pharmacogenomics in Kidney Transplantation.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2018Review
- Mechanisms and biomarkers of immune quiescence in kidney transplantation.Human immunology · 2018Review
- Epigenetics in Kidney Transplantation: Current Evidence, Predictions, and Future Research Directions.Transplantation · 2016Review
- Differentially expressed gene transcripts using RNA sequencing from the blood of immunosuppressed kidney allograft recipients.PloS one · 2015Article
- The urine microRNA profile may help monitor post-transplant renal graft function.Kidney international · 2014Article
- Recent advances in renal interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy after kidney transplantation.Fibrogenesis & tissue repair · 2014Review
- A computational pipeline for the development of multi-marker bio-signature panels and ensemble classifiers.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- The genetics of kidney transplantation.Human genetics · 2012Review
- Human ESC/iPSC-based "Omics" and Bioinformatics for Translational Research.Drug discovery today. Disease models · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of rejection in kidney transplant patients is based on histologic classification of a graft biopsy. The current "gold standard" is the Banff 97 criteria; however, there are several limitations in classifying rejection based on biopsy samples. First, a biopsy involves an invasive procedure. Second, there is significant variance among blinded pathologists in the interpretation of a biopsy. And third, there is also variance between the histology and the molecular profiles of a biopsy. To increase the positive predictive value of classifiers of rejection, a Banff committee is developing criteria that integrate histologic and molecular data into a unified classifier that could diagnose and prognose rejection. To develop the most appropriate molecular criteria, there have been studies by multiple groups applying omics technologies in attempts to identify biomarkers of rejection. In this review, we discuss studies using genome-wide data sets of the transcriptome and proteome to investigate acute rejection, chronic allograft dysfunction, and tolerance. We also discuss studies which focus on genetic biomarkers in urine and peripheral blood, which will provide clinicians with minimally invasive methods for monitoring transplant patients. We also discuss emerging technologies, including whole-exome sequencing and RNA-Seq and new bioinformatic and systems biology approaches, which should increase the ability to develop both biomarkers and mechanistic understanding of the rejection process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.