ArticleNursing research
Application of a hierarchical model incorporating intrafamily correlation and cluster effects.
Article in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Motivational interviewing with parents of overweight children: study design and methods for the NOURISH + MI study.Contemporary clinical trials · 2014Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResearch interventions at the family level often include individual- and group-level data that can present an analytic challenge. The study that motivated this article was an intervention study conducted with elementary school children and their parents. Randomization occurred at the school level, with families nested within schools. Repeated measurements collected from children and parents at different time points presented modeling challenges, including how to specify the covariance structure correctly among all measurements.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to introduce a mixed model with random effects to model the correlations among family members, repeated measures, and the grouping effect.
methodsA hierarchical random-effect model was used that included both fixed and random effects; time and intervention-by-time variables were included as fixed effects, the school-specific variable was included as random effect, and the intrafamily correlation was modeled through a spatial autoregression covariance matrix. Comparisons were made between the performance of the proposed modeling method and that of other parsimony models using Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC).
resultsThe proposed modeling method produced a 3% and 9% reduction in AIC values, respectively, compared with the two other models. The likelihood ratio test further confirmed that the full model was better than the other two models (p < .0001 for both models). DISCUSSION: The data suggest that using the proposed mixed model technique will produce a significantly better model fit for intrafamily correlation with a nested study design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.