Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21317823›Full record

ArticleNursing research

Application of a hierarchical model incorporating intrafamily correlation and cluster effects.

An-Lin Cheng, Patricia J Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

An-Lin ChengSchool of Nursing, University of Missouri-Kansas City, MO 64108, USA. chenga@umkc.edu
Patricia J Kelly

Funding

Familias En Accion: Educating &Changing CommunitiesR01NR008565 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI KELLY, PATRICIA J · 2005 to 2008
$1.9M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR008565NINR NIH HHS R01NR8565-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch interventions at the family level often include individual- and group-level data that can present an analytic challenge. The study that motivated this article was an intervention study conducted with elementary school children and their parents. Randomization occurred at the school level, with families nested within schools. Repeated measurements collected from children and parents at different time points presented modeling challenges, including how to specify the covariance structure correctly among all measurements.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to introduce a mixed model with random effects to model the correlations among family members, repeated measures, and the grouping effect.

methodsA hierarchical random-effect model was used that included both fixed and random effects; time and intervention-by-time variables were included as fixed effects, the school-specific variable was included as random effect, and the intrafamily correlation was modeled through a spatial autoregression covariance matrix. Comparisons were made between the performance of the proposed modeling method and that of other parsimony models using Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC).

resultsThe proposed modeling method produced a 3% and 9% reduction in AIC values, respectively, compared with the two other models. The likelihood ratio test further confirmed that the full model was better than the other two models (p < .0001 for both models). DISCUSSION: The data suggest that using the proposed mixed model technique will produce a significantly better model fit for intrafamily correlation with a nested study design.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalChildHumansLikelihood FunctionsModels, NursingParentsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID21317823
PMCPMC3087840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.